Source=Fin(1)={0,…,0}, codomain=Fin(1)={0,…,0}; each input must have exactly one data row. Candidate raw rows=[[0, 0]]. Give ([n,m], row-endpoint typing mask, raw occurrence counts for each legal input, missing inputs, repeated inputs, total-table eligibility, ordered images or not-total-table). Count by input before rejecting an outside output.
G001 — Source=Fin(1)={0,…,0}, codomain=Fin(1)={0,…,0}; each input must have exactly one data row. Candidate raw rows=[[0, 0]]. Give ([n,m], row-endpoint typing mask, raw occurrence counts for each legal input, missing inputs, repeated inputs, total-table eligibility, ordered images or not-total-table). Count by input before rejecting an outside output.
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
Fin(0) is empty;a complete total table is not a partial program function,and its actual range need not equal its declared codomain.This audits finite data,not general infinite-set theorems.
The one-row protocol requires exactly one raw row per source.Even identical repeated values violate that format,but do not imply the deduplicated mathematical relation is multivalued.
Only both conditions permit orderedImages by source index.An empty source with no rows is a complete empty table;do not construct a table for an illegal candidate.
S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
Result
([1, 1], [Yes], [1], [], [], Yes, [0])
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.