Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 7291: Candidate One-Row Protocol and Total-Table Eligibility

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 37

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0013-07291 · q-20261011-advance-20261015-r03-domain-codomain-range-0091

Original question and givens

Source=Fin(3)={0,…,2}, codomain=Fin(2)={0,…,1}; each input must have exactly one data row. Candidate raw rows=[[2, 0]]. Give ([n,m], row-endpoint typing mask, raw occurrence counts for each legal input, missing inputs, repeated inputs, total-table eligibility, ordered images or not-total-table). Count by input before rejecting an outside output.

  • G001 — Source=Fin(3)={0,…,2}, codomain=Fin(2)={0,…,1}; each input must have exactly one data row. Candidate raw rows=[[2, 0]]. Give ([n,m], row-endpoint typing mask, raw occurrence counts for each legal input, missing inputs, repeated inputs, total-table eligibility, ordered images or not-total-table). Count by input before rejecting an outside output.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

declared types Fin(3)→Fin(2);0-based source labels

After

domain,codomain and actual range remain distinct

Conditions: none

Fin(0) is empty;a complete total table is not a partial program function,and its actual range need not equal its declared codomain.This audits finite data,not general infinite-set theorems.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: typed_domain_codomain_data_scope · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

raw row position=0;input=2;output=0

After

both ends typed=Yes

Conditions: none

Check both endpoint types row by row,but count every raw occurrence of a legal input even if its output is outside the codomain.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: raw_candidate_table_row_type · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

source input=0;raw row count=0

After

exactly one row=No

Conditions: none

The one-row protocol requires exactly one raw row per source.Even identical repeated values violate that format,but do not imply the deduplicated mathematical relation is multivalued.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: one_raw_row_per_input_audit · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

source input=1;raw row count=0

After

exactly one row=No

Conditions: none

The one-row protocol requires exactly one raw row per source.Even identical repeated values violate that format,but do not imply the deduplicated mathematical relation is multivalued.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: one_raw_row_per_input_audit · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

source input=2;raw row count=1

After

exactly one row=Yes

Conditions: none

The one-row protocol requires exactly one raw row per source.Even identical repeated values violate that format,but do not imply the deduplicated mathematical relation is multivalued.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: one_raw_row_per_input_audit · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

row typing=[Yes];input counts=[0, 0, 1]

After

complete one-row table=No;ordered images=not a total table

Conditions: none

Only both conditions permit orderedImages by source index.An empty source with no rows is a complete empty table;do not construct a table for an illegal candidate.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: candidate_table_protocol_not_relation_multivaluedness · Uses: G001, S005

Reverse checks

  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([3, 2], [Yes], [0, 0, 1], [0, 1], [], No, not-total-table)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 402d3d003cfa3ed8517fdd35ddc5bc0e734618bc1211a65318776a993ed0bf39
  • candidate record SHA-256: 99dc331247c02dffd6952944b1e35670695a72664195c4162ac41d11a32b0b95
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: e89fc6d4a50a4a7fc942c6c8939a92f835e30105a9a5850e37dd198f31c1ed59
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 0e1039f4cf022bf35af4e5531651c9a2b7ca7a5fdacac34fb1e4bcd9a81f6299
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON