Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 7196: Finite Sequence Query Bounds before Evaluation

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 36

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0013-07196 · q-20261011-advance-20261015-r05-sequence-0021

Original question and givens

N begins at 0; retain sequence order and repeated values. A finite prefix does not determine a unique infinite rule, convergence, or infinite series. L=4; only 0≤n<L is allowed for a_n=8+(1)n. Ordered candidate indices=[0, 3, 4]. Give (L, index-eligibility mask, legal term values or invalid-index).

  • G001 — N begins at 0; retain sequence order and repeated values. A finite prefix does not determine a unique infinite rule, convergence, or infinite series. L=4; only 0≤n<L is allowed for a_n=8+(1)n. Ordered candidate indices=[0, 3, 4]. Give (L, index-eligibility mask, legal term values or invalid-index).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

N starts at0;ordered finite indices and repeated values retained

After

given recurrences differ from guessing an infinite rule from observations

Conditions: none

Sequences are ordered and may repeat.A finite observed prefix alone does not determine a unique infinite rule;when a recurrence is explicitly supplied,use that rule rather than inventing one.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_ordered_sequence_scope · Uses: G001

S002 · calculation

Before

query0 d times index := mul(1, 0)

After

query0 d times index = 0

Conditions: none

Substitute into the term formula only inside the permitted finite index domain.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

query0 legal sequence value := sum(8, 0)

After

query0 legal sequence value = 8

Conditions: none

Add the initial value to signed increment times index;negative term values are allowed.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

candidate index=0;0≤index<4=Yes

After

value/status=8

Conditions: none

An outside candidate is not an already supplied term,even if a number could be inserted into an extrapolated formula.L=0 has no legal indices.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_sequence_index_guard · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

query1 d times index := mul(1, 3)

After

query1 d times index = 3

Conditions: none

Substitute into the term formula only inside the permitted finite index domain.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · calculation

Before

query1 legal sequence value := sum(8, 3)

After

query1 legal sequence value = 11

Conditions: none

Add the initial value to signed increment times index;negative term values are allowed.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · implies

Before

candidate index=3;0≤index<4=Yes

After

value/status=11

Conditions: none

An outside candidate is not an already supplied term,even if a number could be inserted into an extrapolated formula.L=0 has no legal indices.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_sequence_index_guard · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · implies

Before

candidate index=4;0≤index<4=No

After

value/status=invalid index

Conditions: none

An outside candidate is not an already supplied term,even if a number could be inserted into an extrapolated formula.L=0 has no legal indices.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_sequence_index_guard · Uses: G001, S007

Reverse checks

  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute query1 legal sequence value with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute query1 d times index with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute query0 legal sequence value with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute query0 d times index with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(4, [Yes, Yes, No], [8, 11, invalid-index])

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: b1130205bc9ab37f251c8f2a7e3907911707246dba30b7e901224245f4d68ba9
  • candidate record SHA-256: c23ee896b224c6734128a98383c2ccdc941a069fc22f0b579b5f54705ea99d44
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: e89fc6d4a50a4a7fc942c6c8939a92f835e30105a9a5850e37dd198f31c1ed59
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 0e1039f4cf022bf35af4e5531651c9a2b7ca7a5fdacac34fb1e4bcd9a81f6299
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON