Use signed determinants of real 2×2 matrices with integer entries; ordinary matrix products are row-by-column, not entrywise products. Real-field invertibility is not integer-ring invertibility. M=[[3, 1], [2, 1]], integer candidate=2. Give (M, signed D, abs(D), candidate−signed D, candidate correctness, invertibility over R).
G001 — Use signed determinants of real 2×2 matrices with integer entries; ordinary matrix products are row-by-column, not entrywise products. Real-field invertibility is not integer-ring invertibility. M=[[3, 1], [2, 1]], integer candidate=2. Give (M, signed D, abs(D), candidate−signed D, candidate correctness, invertibility over R).
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
real2×2 integer-entry slice;determinants are signed
Conditions: none
Compute the signed determinant ad−bc,not its absolute value;matrix multiplication uses row-by-column,not entrywise products.This finite audit is not a general formal proof.
Candidate correctness and invertibility are separate:a correct candidate D=0 does not make the matrix invertible,and for D<0 an absolute-value candidate differs from D.
S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute candidate minus signed determinant with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute M signed determinant with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute M off-diagonal product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute M diagonal product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
Result
([[3, 1], [2, 1]], 1, 1, 1, No, Yes)
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.