Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 7430: Append Candidate Guard before New Table and Collisions

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 38

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0013-07430 · q-20261012-advance-20261016-r06-injective-0055

Original question and givens

Finite types start at 0: Fin(2)={0,…,1}→Fin(2), complete images=[0, 1]. Check the whole original total table before any candidate evaluation; empty-function properties depend on the declared codomain. At the new input label n, append candidate value=-1. Give (original images, new-value codomain eligibility, new images or outside-codomain, new collisions or not-evaluated, new injectivity or not-evaluated). A valid append can create nine input labels.

  • G001 — Finite types start at 0: Fin(2)={0,…,1}→Fin(2), complete images=[0, 1]. Check the whole original total table before any candidate evaluation; empty-function properties depend on the declared codomain. At the new input label n, append candidate value=-1. Give (original images, new-value codomain eligibility, new images or outside-codomain, new collisions or not-evaluated, new injectivity or not-evaluated). A valid append can create nine input labels.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source index=0∈Fin(2)

After

image[0]=0∈Fin(2)

Conditions: none

First type-check every cell of the complete original table,not only cells queried later.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: injective_complete_original_table_row · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source index=1∈Fin(2)

After

image[1]=1∈Fin(2)

Conditions: none

First type-check every cell of the complete original table,not only cells queried later.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: injective_complete_original_table_row · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

Fin(2)→Fin(2);original images=[0, 1]

After

injectivity forbids equal outputs from distinct original input labels

Conditions: none

Injectivity forbids equal outputs for distinct inputs;the empty function is vacuously injective,which is not surjectivity.Type-check the whole original table and retain original labels under restriction or deletion.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_injectivity_label_scope · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

append candidate value=-1;old codomain Fin(2)

After

qualified=No

Conditions: none

Require the new value to lie in the original codomain before constructing a table;an outside value leaves injectivity unevaluated,not False.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: append_output_codomain_guard · Uses: G001, S003

Reverse checks

  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([0, 1], No, outside-codomain, not-evaluated, not-evaluated)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 7da63d2647474027d36ba496e2b4e01675c7a356e5bb107b55e66d31b52c6757
  • candidate record SHA-256: 334e91cd60fd20c0d0dc95d77b46ee63a53e4b9bead24e3ba6bf4f178ee5344d
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: e89fc6d4a50a4a7fc942c6c8939a92f835e30105a9a5850e37dd198f31c1ed59
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 0e1039f4cf022bf35af4e5531651c9a2b7ca7a5fdacac34fb1e4bcd9a81f6299
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON