OCMEBilingual mathematics & derivations繁體中文

Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 8152: Whole Candidate Inverse Type Check and Two Independent Identities

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 41

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0015-08152 · q-20261012-advance-20261017-r02-inverse-function-0027

Original question and givens

Use the complete total map Fin(0)=∅→Fin(2) with images=[] in source-index order. Validate every image in the declared codomain first. Equal finite cardinalities do not make the given map bijective. Candidate g:Fin(2)→Fin(0) has g=[-1, 0]. Give (images, per-cell g type mask, whole-g eligibility, g∘f values, f∘g values, first identity?, second identity?). If any g cell is untyped, use not-evaluated in the last four fields.

  • G001 — Use the complete total map Fin(0)=∅→Fin(2) with images=[] in source-index order. Validate every image in the declared codomain first. Equal finite cardinalities do not make the given map bijective. Candidate g:Fin(2)→Fin(0) has g=[-1, 0]. Give (images, per-cell g type mask, whole-g eligibility, g∘f values, f∘g values, first identity?, second identity?). If any g cell is untyped, use not-evaluated in the last four fields.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

n=0;m=2;images=[]

After

complete typed total map;inverse is not reciprocal

Conditions: none

Validate the whole original total table first.Equal finite cardinalities do not ensure this particular table is bijective,and a zero function value does not prohibit an inverse.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: inverse_typed_map_scope · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

target=0;original images=[]

After

fiber=[];unique=No

Conditions: none

Scan every original input and list all preimages of this declared target.An empty or multiple-preimage fiber cannot supply a cell of a total inverse.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: inverse_complete_target_fiber · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

target=1;original images=[]

After

fiber=[];unique=No

Conditions: none

Scan every original input and list all preimages of this declared target.An empty or multiple-preimage fiber cannot supply a cell of a total inverse.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: inverse_complete_target_fiber · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

n=0;m=2;fibers=[[], []]

After

bijective=No

Conditions: none

For the already total map,exactly one preimage per codomain target is equivalent to bijectivity.The empty-to-empty map qualifies;checking n=m alone is insufficient.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: inverse_bijection_gate · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

candidate g=[-1, 0];target Fin(0)

After

mask=[No, No];whole table eligible=No

Conditions: none

Every candidate cell must be typed,including cells not reached by f.If any cell is invalid,neither composition is evaluated;do not skip that cell.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: whole_inverse_candidate_type_guard · Uses: G001, S004

Reverse checks

  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([], [No, No], No, not-evaluated, not-evaluated, not-evaluated, not-evaluated)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: cd640edcd3b06cfbb54d3d660b026f13ca3ddf5f11f5a991e0f01f3085fa1fd9
  • candidate record SHA-256: 0cd2fee189146cd0c11f8c95c5053d1c9f15f2c8f4c2f5343464e9e6b48cd088
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 6ecad9d909199221a07e923f87425e80b3bdec3eed46fe5910d04fca694cae18
  • question-first witness SHA-256: e8f00458977a09493b5f9f05ab9e6feec72debaf4c7d1c609d1fc95900a35a1b
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON