Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 8324: Typed Relation Projections and Missing Sources

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 42

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0015-08324 · q-20261012-advance-20261017-r03-relation-0024

Original question and givens

The explicitly typed relation R⊆Fin(3)×Fin(3) has ordered pairs=[[0, 0], [0, 1], [1, 1]]. Normalize repeated pairs as a set, in lexicographic order. A relation need not be single-valued or total; its converse need not be an inverse function. Give ([n,m], normalized pairs, source projection, target projection, pair count, missing source labels).

  • G001 — The explicitly typed relation R⊆Fin(3)×Fin(3) has ordered pairs=[[0, 0], [0, 1], [1, 1]]. Normalize repeated pairs as a set, in lexicographic order. A relation need not be single-valued or total; its converse need not be an inverse function. Give ([n,m], normalized pairs, source projection, target projection, pair count, missing source labels).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

types=(3,3);raw ordered pairs=[[0, 0], [0, 1], [1, 1]]

After

normalized relation=[[0, 0], [0, 1], [1, 1]]

Conditions: none

Validate both types of every ordered pair,then deduplicate identical pairs.Swapping coordinates forms the converse,not a sorting of one pair.A relation may be multivalued or partial.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: typed_relation_set_normalization · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

normalized pairs=[[0, 0], [0, 1], [1, 1]];declared sources=[0, 1, 2]

After

source projection=[0, 1];target projection=[0, 1];missing sources=[2];count=3

Conditions: none

Collect and deduplicate first and second coordinates separately.Declared source labels need not occur in the relation;do not invent values for them.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: relation_coordinate_projections · Uses: G001, S001

Reverse checks

  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([3, 3], [[0, 0], [0, 1], [1, 1]], [0, 1], [0, 1], 3, [2])

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 6f5943625933236a838292ff4c375a773eab95d4adf6d262bebd29e26aac606e
  • candidate record SHA-256: 94b0a526a5c59d2ea45b15ccb0dc1173047656023e967e093facabc6dc720c3c
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 6ecad9d909199221a07e923f87425e80b3bdec3eed46fe5910d04fca694cae18
  • question-first witness SHA-256: e8f00458977a09493b5f9f05ab9e6feec72debaf4c7d1c609d1fc95900a35a1b
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON