Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 8334: Typed Converse Relation and Double Converse

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 42

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0015-08334 · q-20261012-advance-20261017-r03-relation-0059

Original question and givens

The explicitly typed relation R⊆Fin(3)×Fin(3) has ordered pairs=[[0, 2]]. Normalize repeated pairs as a set, in lexicographic order. A relation need not be single-valued or total; its converse need not be an inverse function. Give ([n,m], swapped type sizes [m,n], original normalized pairs, normalized converse pairs, double-converse pairs, does the double converse equal the original?).

  • G001 — The explicitly typed relation R⊆Fin(3)×Fin(3) has ordered pairs=[[0, 2]]. Normalize repeated pairs as a set, in lexicographic order. A relation need not be single-valued or total; its converse need not be an inverse function. Give ([n,m], swapped type sizes [m,n], original normalized pairs, normalized converse pairs, double-converse pairs, does the double converse equal the original?).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

types=(3,3);raw ordered pairs=[[0, 2]]

After

normalized relation=[[0, 2]]

Conditions: none

Validate both types of every ordered pair,then deduplicate identical pairs.Swapping coordinates forms the converse,not a sorting of one pair.A relation may be multivalued or partial.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: typed_relation_set_normalization · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

phase=converse;pair=[0, 2]

After

swapped=[2, 0]

Conditions: none

Swap the ordered coordinates together with their source/target types.The converse relation is not automatically an inverse function.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: relation_swap_ordered_coordinates · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

phase=double converse;pair=[2, 0]

After

swapped=[0, 2]

Conditions: none

Swap the ordered coordinates together with their source/target types.The converse relation is not automatically an inverse function.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: relation_swap_ordered_coordinates · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

old types=[3, 3];converse types=[3, 3];converse=[[2, 0]]

After

double converse=[[0, 2]];equal=Yes

Conditions: none

Swapping twice returns the original types and pair set even when the relation is not a function.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: double_converse_typed_audit · Uses: G001, S003

Reverse checks

  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([3, 3], [3, 3], [[0, 2]], [[2, 0]], [[0, 2]], Yes)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 8acf061bbc182e17233f5c8ac4cbbb229653302f8538cba69daaf078f9b5feeb
  • candidate record SHA-256: 5e330fb72a007fe8c479630bee5b2fd53fe75d6979f25c08c09735657481abbb
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 6ecad9d909199221a07e923f87425e80b3bdec3eed46fe5910d04fca694cae18
  • question-first witness SHA-256: e8f00458977a09493b5f9f05ab9e6feec72debaf4c7d1c609d1fc95900a35a1b
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON