Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 9247: Topology Qualification before Discrete or Indiscrete Classification

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 47

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0017-09247 · q-20261013-advance-20261018-r01-topological-space-0072

Original question and givens

Complete finite data: X=Fin(4)={0,…,3}. Candidate open family=[[], [3], [1, 3], [1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3]]. Normalize repeated elements/subsets as sets and order subsets by their binary masks sum(2^x). A pair counterexample is the first ordered pair in that order. The open family and underlying set are different objects; sampling is not an axiom check. Give (n, normalized family, topology?, invalid-candidate/discrete/indiscrete/other-topology). Classify discrete first; on an empty X the discrete and indiscrete families coincide.

  • G001 — Complete finite data: X=Fin(4)={0,…,3}. Candidate open family=[[], [3], [1, 3], [1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3]]. Normalize repeated elements/subsets as sets and order subsets by their binary masks sum(2^x). A pair counterexample is the first ordered pair in that order. The open family and underlying set are different objects; sampling is not an axiom check. Give (n, normalized family, topology?, invalid-candidate/discrete/indiscrete/other-topology). Classify discrete first; on an empty X the discrete and indiscrete families coincide.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

space=given;n=4;raw family=[[], [3], [1, 3], [1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3]]

After

universe=[0, 1, 2, 3];canonical opens=[[], [3], [1, 3], [1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3]]

Conditions: none

Type every candidate as a subset of the same Fin(n),deduplicate elements and members,and order by binary masks.The open family and underlying set are distinct data layers.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_topology_normalize_relative_universe · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

space=given;canonical family=[[], [3], [1, 3], [1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3]]

After

self pairs are idempotent;unordered distinct pairs cover all ordered pairs

Conditions: none

Self pairs are covered by A∪A=A and A∩A=A.Commutativity means all distinct unordered pairs cover every ordered pair;this is not sampling.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: binary_set_operation_symmetry_coverage · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

space=given;A=[];B=[3]

After

union=[3];in family=Yes;intersection=[];in family=Yes

Conditions: none

Form union and intersection from the set definitions and test each against the original family.Preserve the original pair and result for the first failure.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_topology_complete_binary_pair · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

space=given;A=[];B=[1, 3]

After

union=[1, 3];in family=Yes;intersection=[];in family=Yes

Conditions: none

Form union and intersection from the set definitions and test each against the original family.Preserve the original pair and result for the first failure.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_topology_complete_binary_pair · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

space=given;A=[];B=[1, 2, 3]

After

union=[1, 2, 3];in family=Yes;intersection=[];in family=Yes

Conditions: none

Form union and intersection from the set definitions and test each against the original family.Preserve the original pair and result for the first failure.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_topology_complete_binary_pair · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

space=given;A=[];B=[0, 1, 2, 3]

After

union=[0, 1, 2, 3];in family=Yes;intersection=[];in family=Yes

Conditions: none

Form union and intersection from the set definitions and test each against the original family.Preserve the original pair and result for the first failure.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_topology_complete_binary_pair · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · implies

Before

space=given;A=[3];B=[1, 3]

After

union=[1, 3];in family=Yes;intersection=[3];in family=Yes

Conditions: none

Form union and intersection from the set definitions and test each against the original family.Preserve the original pair and result for the first failure.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_topology_complete_binary_pair · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · implies

Before

space=given;A=[3];B=[1, 2, 3]

After

union=[1, 2, 3];in family=Yes;intersection=[3];in family=Yes

Conditions: none

Form union and intersection from the set definitions and test each against the original family.Preserve the original pair and result for the first failure.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_topology_complete_binary_pair · Uses: G001, S007

S009 · implies

Before

space=given;A=[3];B=[0, 1, 2, 3]

After

union=[0, 1, 2, 3];in family=Yes;intersection=[3];in family=Yes

Conditions: none

Form union and intersection from the set definitions and test each against the original family.Preserve the original pair and result for the first failure.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_topology_complete_binary_pair · Uses: G001, S008

S010 · implies

Before

space=given;A=[1, 3];B=[1, 2, 3]

After

union=[1, 2, 3];in family=Yes;intersection=[1, 3];in family=Yes

Conditions: none

Form union and intersection from the set definitions and test each against the original family.Preserve the original pair and result for the first failure.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_topology_complete_binary_pair · Uses: G001, S009

S011 · implies

Before

space=given;A=[1, 3];B=[0, 1, 2, 3]

After

union=[0, 1, 2, 3];in family=Yes;intersection=[1, 3];in family=Yes

Conditions: none

Form union and intersection from the set definitions and test each against the original family.Preserve the original pair and result for the first failure.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_topology_complete_binary_pair · Uses: G001, S010

S012 · implies

Before

space=given;A=[1, 2, 3];B=[0, 1, 2, 3]

After

union=[0, 1, 2, 3];in family=Yes;intersection=[1, 2, 3];in family=Yes

Conditions: none

Form union and intersection from the set definitions and test each against the original family.Preserve the original pair and result for the first failure.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_topology_complete_binary_pair · Uses: G001, S011

S013 · implies

Before

space=given;empty=Yes;full=Yes;union closed=Yes;intersection closed=Yes

After

topology=Yes;first union failure=none;first intersection failure=none

Conditions: none

All four conditions are required.On a finite underlying set there are finitely many distinct opens,so an arbitrary union reduces to a finite distinct-member union,covered by binary closure and the empty union.The empty intersection needs the whole set.Vacuous binary closure does not waive empty/whole-set membership.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_topology_axioms_joint_gate · Uses: G001, S012

S014 · implies

Before

topology qualified=Yes;family size=5;powerset size=16

After

classification=other topology

Conditions: none

Qualify the topology first.All2^n subsets give the discrete topology;otherwise only empty and whole give the indiscrete topology.On the empty space both coincide,and the protocol classifies discrete first.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: topology_classification_after_qualification · Uses: G001, S013

Reverse checks

  • S014 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S013 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S012 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(4, [[], [3], [1, 3], [1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3]], Yes, other-topology)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: bbc6b2f25f2baed4b880e9565ba2d68eace17e592559063066304b2124c47f33
  • candidate record SHA-256: 1900a436c61ce21c957106329aa2062069319d51b80de79336d940f8b2937640
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: abad28564830bb9b6ef069ca5a1aa128ce7b1a67a5cb8fe6d868a06db73bcfb8
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 43126988479968837abe086263dac1b24c37463ad80e00d2e280a7b8e9036a04
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON