Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 9176: Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 46

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0017-09176 · q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0026

Original question and givens

Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=0. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.

  • G001 — Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=0. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

natural-number prime protocol;0 and1 are not prime

After

a failed candidate witness alone is not a primality proof

Conditions: none

Naturals include0.Primality retains both n≥2 and a complete factor bound.A failed single factor candidate only invalidates that witness;it does not certify primality.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: prime_complete_evidence_scope · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

phase=given n;n=0

After

n>=2=No

Conditions: none

A prime must be at least2.Exclude0 and1 first rather than treating an absence of trial factors as primality.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: prime_lower_bound_guard · Uses: G001, S001

Reverse checks

  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(0, not-applicable, No)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: eff0b47db2cac8977d574d2465efc54620f1909a6d4bcf3bc2d0930132e9f98e
  • candidate record SHA-256: fc87fa89dfd775e2435cd27d6a3a09059b1f5350cbaa98bd06e6c90b63aa55d0
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: abad28564830bb9b6ef069ca5a1aa128ce7b1a67a5cb8fe6d868a06db73bcfb8
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 43126988479968837abe086263dac1b24c37463ad80e00d2e280a7b8e9036a04
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON