Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=28, candidate d=3. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).
G001 — Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=28, candidate d=3. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
natural-number prime protocol;0 and1 are not prime
After
a failed candidate witness alone is not a primality proof
Conditions: none
Naturals include0.Primality retains both n≥2 and a complete factor bound.A failed single factor candidate only invalidates that witness;it does not certify primality.
Step identifiers and dependencies
Rule: prime_complete_evidence_scope · Uses: G001
S002 · implies
Before
n=28;candidate d=3
After
nontrivial typed range=Yes
Conditions: none
Require n≥2 and2≤d<n first.Zero,one or n cannot be this nontrivial witness;do not divide by an ineligible d.
quotient/status=not applicable;classification=not a nontrivial factor witness
Conditions: none
An eligible divisor gives n=d*q with both factors>1 and witnesses compositeness.Otherwise report only that the candidate fails,not a primality certificate.
S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
Result
(28, 3, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.