Explore related knowledge and questions →
← Question derivation index · Original question batch
R0017-09032 · q-20261013-advance-20261018-r05-modular-congruence-0032
Fix positive modulus n=8, natural a=19, bound=31. Give (n, a, bound, a mod n, every x∈[0,bound] with x mod n=a mod n).
G001 — Fix positive modulus n=8, natural a=19, bound=31. Give (n, a, bound, a mod n, every x∈[0,bound] with x mod n=a mod n).Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
Before
fixed natural modulus candidate=8
After
positive modulus=Yes
Conditions: none
Congruence compares remainders at one positive modulus,not numerical equality.Multiplicative preservation does not permit unconditional cancellation of a common factor.
Rule: fixed_positive_modulus_scope · Uses: G001
Before
representative remainder:natural dividend=19;positive divisor=8
After
19=2·8+3
Conditions: none
With a positive divisor show the complete quotient/remainder equality and0≤r<divisor.Modulo zero is not evaluated.
Rule: positive_euclidean_division · Uses: G001, S001
Before
window bound minus residue := sub(31, 3)
After
window bound minus residue = 28
Conditions: none
Calculate exactly in the specified source-operand order without approximation or substituting a different candidate.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002
Before
last progression index:natural dividend=28;positive divisor=8
After
28=3·8+4
Conditions: none
With a positive divisor show the complete quotient/remainder equality and0≤r<divisor.Modulo zero is not evaluated.
Rule: positive_euclidean_division · Uses: G001, S003
Before
residue=3;modulus=8;0<=k<=3
After
all class members=[3, 11, 19, 27]
Conditions: none
Euclidean uniqueness gives x≡a exactly when x=r+k*n.Natural x and0≤r<n force k≥0;the bound gives k≤floor((bound−r)/n).Retain the full inclusive progression,not a sample.
Rule: complete_residue_progression · Uses: G001, S004
S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute window bound minus residue with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.(8, 19, 31, 3, [3, 11, 19, 27])
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.
input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50dboriginal question SHA-256: e650c5acb7f89ab6cd875e094b5389d1e7fc4e382c060bfa183fdb0300e1f692candidate record SHA-256: 7b285dc7b8a3b2ac75aa587f378ffc7105fd7ec31f1b3b7c2a3039f18fd5a9b3semantic review receipt SHA-256: abad28564830bb9b6ef069ca5a1aa128ce7b1a67a5cb8fe6d868a06db73bcfb8question-first witness SHA-256: 43126988479968837abe086263dac1b24c37463ad80e00d2e280a7b8e9036a04Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED