Explore related knowledge and questions →
← Question derivation index · Original question batch
R0016-08696 · q-20261013-advance-20261018-r06-decision-problem-0096
The explicit finite input set is Fin(6)={0,…,5} and its yes-instance set is [2, 4], normalized as a set. The specification is separate from the supplied Boolean decider table; finite table agreement implies no general infinite-domain decidability result. Complete decider=[false, false, true, false, true, true], checked subset=[0, 2]. Give (n, checked labels, sampled mismatches, complete mismatches, sample agreement?, complete agreement?, complete-agreement/sample-passed-full-failed/sample-failed).
G001 — The explicit finite input set is Fin(6)={0,…,5} and its yes-instance set is [2, 4], normalized as a set. The specification is separate from the supplied Boolean decider table; finite table agreement implies no general infinite-domain decidability result. Complete decider=[false, false, true, false, true, true], checked subset=[0, 2]. Give (n, checked labels, sampled mismatches, complete mismatches, sample agreement?, complete agreement?, complete-agreement/sample-passed-full-failed/sample-failed).Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
Before
domain Fin(6);raw yes instances=[2, 4]
After
normalized yes set=[2, 4]
Conditions: none
Keep the yes-instance specification separate from the candidate decider.Deduplicate labels as a set and reject outside-domain labels.A complete finite table does not prove an arbitrary program decidable or terminating on infinite inputs.
Rule: finite_decision_spec_not_program_execution · Uses: G001
Before
input=0;spec=No;declared decider=No
After
mismatch=No
Conditions: none
Compare specification and decider at the same original input,checking every cell.The decider does not define its own correctness.
Rule: finite_decision_each_decider_cell · Uses: G001, S001
Before
input=1;spec=No;declared decider=No
After
mismatch=No
Conditions: none
Compare specification and decider at the same original input,checking every cell.The decider does not define its own correctness.
Rule: finite_decision_each_decider_cell · Uses: G001, S002
Before
input=2;spec=Yes;declared decider=Yes
After
mismatch=No
Conditions: none
Compare specification and decider at the same original input,checking every cell.The decider does not define its own correctness.
Rule: finite_decision_each_decider_cell · Uses: G001, S003
Before
input=3;spec=No;declared decider=No
After
mismatch=No
Conditions: none
Compare specification and decider at the same original input,checking every cell.The decider does not define its own correctness.
Rule: finite_decision_each_decider_cell · Uses: G001, S004
Before
input=4;spec=Yes;declared decider=Yes
After
mismatch=No
Conditions: none
Compare specification and decider at the same original input,checking every cell.The decider does not define its own correctness.
Rule: finite_decision_each_decider_cell · Uses: G001, S005
Before
input=5;spec=No;declared decider=Yes
After
mismatch=Yes
Conditions: none
Compare specification and decider at the same original input,checking every cell.The decider does not define its own correctness.
Rule: finite_decision_each_decider_cell · Uses: G001, S006
Before
checked labels=[0, 2];all mismatch labels=[5]
After
sample mismatches=[];sample agrees=Yes;complete agrees=No;class=sample passes but the complete check fails
Conditions: none
Inventory sampled and full-domain mismatches separately.An empty sample passes without guaranteeing full agreement.Classify full agreement first,then distinguish a passing sample from one that already finds an error.
Rule: sample_agreement_not_complete_agreement · Uses: G001, S007
S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.(6, [0, 2], [], [5], Yes, No, sample-passed-full-failed)
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.
input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50dboriginal question SHA-256: 7c02a6aa908d9671ebef5e5415361e8391f8494336550fb45b765d4fc6f5541ecandidate record SHA-256: 120325baac2daff66d44e1e398d94e03dd440790940318dbfbebd2f906784a57semantic review receipt SHA-256: 00fcddb10a9fb0f56697308976a52e68e2537472bd8e68ecbe96d3c4553f4ad2question-first witness SHA-256: 198e04380b2d32aef2375b07ca0df1f8afa454d1184993173fad8a3c9187a3d1Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED