Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 8888: Synthetic Required and Available Context Names

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 45

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0016-08888 · q-20261013-advance-20261018-r07-lean-formal-statement-0038

Original question and givens

These are synthetic pipeline receipts, not actual Lean elaboration or kernel checks. The Chinese source pulse did not run Lean builds for these records. A formal statement and a checked proof are distinct states. environment_id="env-12", required_names=["Nat","x12"], available_names=["Nat","h"]. Give (environment ID, sorted distinct required names, sorted distinct available names, missing required names, complete?). Use the specified English-locale name order and retain opaque names exactly.

  • G001 — These are synthetic pipeline receipts, not actual Lean elaboration or kernel checks. The Chinese source pulse did not run Lean builds for these records. A formal statement and a checked proof are distinct states. environment_id="env-12", required_names=["Nat","x12"], available_names=["Nat","h"]. Give (environment ID, sorted distinct required names, sorted distinct available names, missing required names, complete?). Use the specified English-locale name order and retain opaque names exactly.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

all pipeline flags,names and receipt fields are synthetic input data

After

no actual Lean run,digest verification,name resolution or kernel acceptance is claimed

Conditions: none

These are supplied synthetic receipts,not a Lean run.String fields,coherent flags or complete metadata do not establish actual elaboration,file-digest verification or kernel acceptance.The teaching candidate remains not formalized.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: synthetic_formal_receipt_not_execution · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

environment=env-12;raw required=[Nat, x12];raw available=[Nat, h]

After

English-locale distinct required=[Nat, x12];available=[h, Nat]

Conditions: none

Deduplicate and sort in the specified English locale while preserving every opaque name's characters and case.Names are neither translated nor semantically resolved.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: formal_opaque_context_name_normalization · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

required opaque name=Nat;available names=[h, Nat]

After

present=Yes

Conditions: none

Test complete-name membership in the declared inventory.Similar spelling,prefixes or a package's possible availability do not replace this membership test.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: formal_declared_name_membership · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

required opaque name=x12;available names=[h, Nat]

After

present=No

Conditions: none

Test complete-name membership in the declared inventory.Similar spelling,prefixes or a package's possible availability do not replace this membership test.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: formal_declared_name_membership · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

missing required names=[x12]

After

declared inventory complete=No

Conditions: none

An empty missing-name list means only that these synthetic inventories cover the requirements.It does not establish real Lean resolution or a proof.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: formal_context_inventory_not_resolution · Uses: G001, S004

Reverse checks

  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(env-12, [Nat, x12], [h, Nat], [x12], No)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 7658ce745483f1f88e4fa9837489674d3d35d52c5516d1eb17cc4508fe2c97f5
  • candidate record SHA-256: 2bde8546fd7021ef24e2d2646a4422884636efe52ca03e0852afa1c60ab33f77
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 00fcddb10a9fb0f56697308976a52e68e2537472bd8e68ecbe96d3c4553f4ad2
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 198e04380b2d32aef2375b07ca0df1f8afa454d1184993173fad8a3c9187a3d1
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON