Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 8933: Synthetic Receipt Metadata Completeness, Not Proof Acceptance

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 45

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0016-08933 · q-20261013-advance-20261018-r07-lean-formal-statement-0083

Original question and givens

These are synthetic pipeline receipts, not actual Lean elaboration or kernel checks. The Chinese source pulse did not run Lean builds for these records. A formal statement and a checked proof are distinct states. Supplied metadata={"lean_version":"4.27.0","imports":["Mathlib","Module7"],"imports_declared":true,"environment_id":"","context_id":"ctx-7","source_sha256":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000007","core_type":"Prop","elaboration_status":"success"}. Give (version or missing, sorted distinct imports, imports declared?, environment or missing, context or missing, lexical lowercase 64-hex source-hash shape?, core type or missing, status or missing, missing-field reasons in protocol order, metadata complete?). Imports may be explicitly empty. Hash shape is not a verified source digest.

  • G001 — These are synthetic pipeline receipts, not actual Lean elaboration or kernel checks. The Chinese source pulse did not run Lean builds for these records. A formal statement and a checked proof are distinct states. Supplied metadata={"lean_version":"4.27.0","imports":["Mathlib","Module7"],"imports_declared":true,"environment_id":"","context_id":"ctx-7","source_sha256":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000007","core_type":"Prop","elaboration_status":"success"}. Give (version or missing, sorted distinct imports, imports declared?, environment or missing, context or missing, lexical lowercase 64-hex source-hash shape?, core type or missing, status or missing, missing-field reasons in protocol order, metadata complete?). Imports may be explicitly empty. Hash shape is not a verified source digest.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

all pipeline flags,names and receipt fields are synthetic input data

After

no actual Lean run,digest verification,name resolution or kernel acceptance is claimed

Conditions: none

These are supplied synthetic receipts,not a Lean run.String fields,coherent flags or complete metadata do not establish actual elaboration,file-digest verification or kernel acceptance.The teaching candidate remains not formalized.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: synthetic_formal_receipt_not_execution · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

raw imports=[Mathlib, Module7];imports declared=Yes

After

English-locale distinct imports=[Mathlib, Module7]

Conditions: none

Sort and deduplicate imports in the English locale.An explicitly empty list is allowed;declaration is a separate flag.No imports are actually executed.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: synthetic_import_inventory_not_actual_imports · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

synthetic field=lean_version;supplied value=4.27.0

After

lexical/presence condition=Yes

Conditions: none

Apply the protocol's presence,flag,64-lowercase-hex-shape and exact Prop/success tests.This does not hash a source file or rerun type checking.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: synthetic_receipt_each_field_condition · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

synthetic field=imports_declaration;supplied value=Yes

After

lexical/presence condition=Yes

Conditions: none

Apply the protocol's presence,flag,64-lowercase-hex-shape and exact Prop/success tests.This does not hash a source file or rerun type checking.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: synthetic_receipt_each_field_condition · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

synthetic field=environment_id;supplied value=

After

lexical/presence condition=No

Conditions: none

Apply the protocol's presence,flag,64-lowercase-hex-shape and exact Prop/success tests.This does not hash a source file or rerun type checking.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: synthetic_receipt_each_field_condition · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

synthetic field=context_id;supplied value=ctx-7

After

lexical/presence condition=Yes

Conditions: none

Apply the protocol's presence,flag,64-lowercase-hex-shape and exact Prop/success tests.This does not hash a source file or rerun type checking.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: synthetic_receipt_each_field_condition · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · implies

Before

synthetic field=source_sha256;supplied value=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000007

After

lexical/presence condition=Yes

Conditions: none

Apply the protocol's presence,flag,64-lowercase-hex-shape and exact Prop/success tests.This does not hash a source file or rerun type checking.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: synthetic_receipt_each_field_condition · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · implies

Before

synthetic field=core_type_Prop;supplied value=Prop

After

lexical/presence condition=Yes

Conditions: none

Apply the protocol's presence,flag,64-lowercase-hex-shape and exact Prop/success tests.This does not hash a source file or rerun type checking.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: synthetic_receipt_each_field_condition · Uses: G001, S007

S009 · implies

Before

synthetic field=elaboration_success;supplied value=success

After

lexical/presence condition=Yes

Conditions: none

Apply the protocol's presence,flag,64-lowercase-hex-shape and exact Prop/success tests.This does not hash a source file or rerun type checking.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: synthetic_receipt_each_field_condition · Uses: G001, S008

S010 · implies

Before

missing reasons in protocol order=[environment_id]

After

synthetic metadata complete=No

Conditions: none

Keep missing reasons in protocol order.Complete metadata guarantees neither truthful contents,an existing environment,a proved statement nor a successful kernel execution.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: synthetic_metadata_complete_not_proof · Uses: G001, S009

Reverse checks

  • S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(4.27.0, [Mathlib, Module7], Yes, missing, ctx-7, Yes, Prop, success, [environment_id], No)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: ffb64eb91a3e80a318ac4b0342ea24a40c1d9225e692b92a70464e85e339a326
  • candidate record SHA-256: dc2e0aba1083d9075be383909229b9b47d3e69a766428030e92654ffe2cdcd40
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 00fcddb10a9fb0f56697308976a52e68e2537472bd8e68ecbe96d3c4553f4ad2
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 198e04380b2d32aef2375b07ca0df1f8afa454d1184993173fad8a3c9187a3d1
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON