Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 9740: Containment, Openness, and Neighborhood Status Are Different

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 49

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0018-09740 · q-20261013-advance-20261019-r02-neighborhood-0040

Original question and givens

Use the complete finite topology on X=Fin(4)={0,…,3} with opens=[[], [2], [0, 2], [0, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3]]. Normalize subsets and repeated members as sets; order families by binary subset masks. Complements are relative to this same X. Closed does not mean not open. Point x=-1, candidate N=[0]. Give (n, x, point in X?, N, x∈N?, N open?, N a neighborhood?). If x is outside X, use not-evaluated for the final three claims.

  • G001 — Use the complete finite topology on X=Fin(4)={0,…,3} with opens=[[], [2], [0, 2], [0, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3]]. Normalize subsets and repeated members as sets; order families by binary subset masks. Complements are relative to this same X. Closed does not mean not open. Point x=-1, candidate N=[0]. Give (n, x, point in X?, N, x∈N?, N open?, N a neighborhood?). If x is outside X, use not-evaluated for the final three claims.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

n=4;raw open family=[[], [2], [0, 2], [0, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3]]

After

universe=[0, 1, 2, 3];normalized opens=[[], [2], [0, 2], [0, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3]];empty=Yes;full=Yes;union closed=Yes;intersection closed=Yes

Conditions: none

Deduplicate subsets/families and order by masks.Check empty/whole membership and all binary union/intersection closure.On a finite underlying set,arbitrary unions reduce to finitely many distinct members.These tasks require an actual topology;invalid data is not used for later properties.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: given_complete_finite_topology_guard · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

point candidate=-1;underlying Fin(4)

After

point qualified=No

Conditions: none

An outside point leaves neighborhood claims unevaluated,not False via negative indexing or an empty witness list.Candidate sets must still independently be typed.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: neighborhood_point_domain_guard · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

raw candidate=[0]

After

typed normalized candidate=[0]

Conditions: none

Set normalization and point qualification are separate data conditions.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: neighborhood_candidate_set_normalization · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

point qualified=No;candidate=[0]

After

contains point/status=not evaluated;open/status=not evaluated;neighborhood/status=not evaluated

Conditions: none

Keep point membership,openness and neighborhood status separate.For an outside point the protocol leaves all three fields unevaluated;do not silently fill one from an independent set computation.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: neighborhood_membership_openness_not_identical · Uses: G001, S003

Reverse checks

  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(4, -1, No, [0], not-evaluated, not-evaluated, not-evaluated)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 1d1264828d9dbd9c281ce3aac80d114a5f67d910806f26d909d294c879b2c5a4
  • candidate record SHA-256: bf6ab6982259c530f508cf336959482aba54bcd4a316ec5e40b315d52238ecab
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: bd35da62087a15d6b89b45585dc46e89b9efbe097cba7b3c707b5030496f013c
  • question-first witness SHA-256: fab45a10d8ac95c7d61d32e47d1bdd3ca862c17c3289a6bf4b01d4dc9492fbb6
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON