Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 9499: One Declared Target-Open Preimage

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 48

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0017-09499 · q-20261013-advance-20261019-r03-topological-continuity-0024

Original question and givens

Use complete finite topologies X=Fin(4)={0,…,3}, opens_X=[[], [3], [2, 3], [1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3]] and Y=Fin(4)={0,…,3}, opens_Y=[[], [3], [1, 3], [1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3]]. The complete total map has images=[3, 2, 1, 0] in source order. All entries must type-check; set preimages are not inverse functions. Given target_open=[1, 2, 3] is required to be open in Y. Give (n, m, target open, its full preimage, preimage open in X?). This one-set check alone is not a complete continuity audit.

  • G001 — Use complete finite topologies X=Fin(4)={0,…,3}, opens_X=[[], [3], [2, 3], [1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3]] and Y=Fin(4)={0,…,3}, opens_Y=[[], [3], [1, 3], [1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3]]. The complete total map has images=[3, 2, 1, 0] in source order. All entries must type-check; set preimages are not inverse functions. Given target_open=[1, 2, 3] is required to be open in Y. Give (n, m, target open, its full preimage, preimage open in X?). This one-set check alone is not a complete continuity audit.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

space=X;n=4;raw family=[[], [3], [2, 3], [1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3]]

After

universe=[0, 1, 2, 3];canonical opens=[[], [3], [2, 3], [1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3]]

Conditions: none

Type every candidate as a subset of the same Fin(n),deduplicate elements and members,and order by binary masks.The open family and underlying set are distinct data layers.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_topology_normalize_relative_universe · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

space=X;empty=Yes;full=Yes;union closed=Yes;intersection closed=Yes

After

topology=Yes;first union failure=none;first intersection failure=none

Conditions: none

All four conditions are required.On a finite underlying set there are finitely many distinct opens,so an arbitrary union reduces to a finite distinct-member union,covered by binary closure and the empty union.The empty intersection needs the whole set.Vacuous binary closure does not waive empty/whole-set membership.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_topology_axioms_joint_gate · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

space=Y;n=4;raw family=[[], [3], [1, 3], [1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3]]

After

universe=[0, 1, 2, 3];canonical opens=[[], [3], [1, 3], [1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3]]

Conditions: none

Type every candidate as a subset of the same Fin(n),deduplicate elements and members,and order by binary masks.The open family and underlying set are distinct data layers.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_topology_normalize_relative_universe · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

space=Y;empty=Yes;full=Yes;union closed=Yes;intersection closed=Yes

After

topology=Yes;first union failure=none;first intersection failure=none

Conditions: none

All four conditions are required.On a finite underlying set there are finitely many distinct opens,so an arbitrary union reduces to a finite distinct-member union,covered by binary closure and the empty union.The empty intersection needs the whole set.Vacuous binary closure does not waive empty/whole-set membership.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_topology_axioms_joint_gate · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

f:Fin(4)->Fin(4);whole images=[3, 2, 1, 0]

After

all original image entries typed;source labels retained

Conditions: none

Validate every cell of the complete total table even for a query about the empty preimage.Retain original source indices;do not discard invalid cells because a query does not use them.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: whole_topological_total_map_guard · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

declared target open=[1, 2, 3];target family=[[], [3], [1, 3], [1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2, 3]]

After

target-open prerequisite satisfied;one row is not whole continuity

Conditions: none

The supplied set must actually be open in the target.Passing this single preimage test does not establish continuity of the whole map.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: single_preimage_not_complete_continuity · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · implies

Before

map=f single query;images=[3, 2, 1, 0];target open=[1, 2, 3]

After

full preimage=[0, 1, 2];source open=No

Conditions: none

Collect every original source label with f(x) in U,then test the complete set in the source open family.A set preimage is not an inverse function and requires neither injectivity nor surjectivity.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: complete_open_preimage_row · Uses: G001, S006

Reverse checks

  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(4, 4, [1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2], No)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: d11f38f97c85c520467c5b26b2b607a83a9e3f51e3d220930aad5328108aaf79
  • candidate record SHA-256: b88113b7c353bcc31b9ca4cef733a3a9658903e0c27826008f2a1d99b95852a7
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: abad28564830bb9b6ef069ca5a1aa128ce7b1a67a5cb8fe6d868a06db73bcfb8
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 43126988479968837abe086263dac1b24c37463ad80e00d2e280a7b8e9036a04
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON