Fix the cost model. Coefficients in ascending powers are f=[23, 3, 1], g=[1, 24, 1, 1]; all are nonnegative. Give (original f coefficients, original g coefficients, degree f, degree g, O?, Ω?, Θ?). Use degree -1 for the zero polynomial; retain original vectors including trailing zeros.
G001 — Fix the cost model. Coefficients in ascending powers are f=[23, 3, 1], g=[1, 24, 1, 1]; all are nonnegative. Give (original f coefficients, original g coefficients, degree f, degree g, O?, Ω?, Θ?). Use degree -1 for the zero polynomial; retain original vectors including trailing zeros.
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
fixed cost model;explicit nonnegative functions on natural n
After
O,Omega and Theta quantify positive constants over a full tail
Conditions: none
Fix the cost model and function family first.O requires C>0 and N with an upper bound for every n≥N;Omega is the corresponding positive lower bound,and Theta requires both.Finite measurements describe only a finite window.
Retain the original coefficient vector including trailing zeros.The highest nonzero index is the degree;the zero polynomial has degree−1.For a nonzero polynomial with nonnegative coefficients and n≥1,leading*n^degree≤P(n)≤sum(coeff)*n^degree,so no leading cancellation occurs.
Retain the original coefficient vector including trailing zeros.The highest nonzero index is the degree;the zero polynomial has degree−1.For a nonzero polynomial with nonnegative coefficients and n≥1,leading*n^degree≤P(n)≤sum(coeff)*n^degree,so no leading cancellation occurs.
Separate zero and nonzero-degree cases.A success supplies positive C and a full-tail bound;a failure gives a larger integer n for every proposed C,N,not just a finite sample.Omega is obtained by swapping numerator/denominator in the equivalent O condition and reciprocating a positive constant.
direction=g versus f (Omega);degrees=(3,2);sums=(27,27);leading=(1,1)
After
Big-O=No;argument=for any C>0,N choose integer n>=max(N,1) and n>C*27/1;positive exponent gap=1 forces numerator>C*denominator
Conditions: none
Separate zero and nonzero-degree cases.A success supplies positive C and a full-tail bound;a failure gives a larger integer n for every proposed C,N,not just a finite sample.Omega is obtained by swapping numerator/denominator in the equivalent O condition and reciprocating a positive constant.
For zero versus zero both bounds0≤C*0 hold.Zero versus nonzero gives only the upper class;nonzero versus zero gives only the lower class.Compare degrees only in nonzero cases;degree−1 is not a nonzero constant degree.
S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute g coefficient sum with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute f coefficient sum with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
Result
([23, 3, 1], [1, 24, 1, 1], 2, 3, Yes, No, No)
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.