Use the complete finite self-map on Fin(7)={0,…,6} given by T(x)=(a*x+b) mod 7, a=13, b=29. Choose the least nonnegative residue, including for negative a*x+b. Time is discrete, indexed from 0; a finite orbit is not a general stability result. x0=5, updates=3. Give (modulus, a, b, x0, update count, orbit including x0). Zero updates gives the one-element prefix [x0].
G001 — Use the complete finite self-map on Fin(7)={0,…,6} given by T(x)=(a*x+b) mod 7, a=13, b=29. Choose the least nonnegative residue, including for negative a*x+b. Time is discrete, indexed from 0; a finite orbit is not a general stability result. x0=5, updates=3. Give (modulus, a, b, x0, update count, orbit including x0). Zero updates gives the one-element prefix [x0].
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
The integer identity together with0≤remainder<n determines the next state.
Step identifiers and dependencies
Rule: euclidean_remainder · Uses: G001, S010
S012 · implies
Before
computed transitions=3
After
orbit=[5, 3, 5, 3]; number of entries=4
Conditions: none
Apply the same T to the preceding result; k transitions give k+1 states.
Step identifiers and dependencies
Rule: orbit_prefix_length · Uses: G001, S011
S013 · implies
Before
a finite requested prefix
After
no unrequested least-period claim
Conditions: none
This output is the requested prefix;it is not an unverified least-period proof from a few orbit values.
Step identifiers and dependencies
Rule: finite_prefix_scope · Uses: G001, S012
Reverse checks
S013 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S012 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute transition3: a·x+b with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute transition3: a·x with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute transition2: a·x+b with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute transition2: a·x with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute transition1: a·x+b with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute transition1: a·x with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
Result
(7, 13, 29, 5, 3, [5, 3, 5, 3])
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.