Use the complete finite self-map on Fin(9)={0,…,8} given by T(x)=(a*x+b) mod 9, a=10, b=6. Choose the least nonnegative residue, including for negative a*x+b. Time is discrete, indexed from 0; a finite orbit is not a general stability result. Candidate subset=[2, 3], normalized as a set. Give (modulus, a, b, normalized subset, sorted distinct image, is the image contained in the subset?).
G001 — Use the complete finite self-map on Fin(9)={0,…,8} given by T(x)=(a*x+b) mod 9, a=10, b=6. Choose the least nonnegative residue, including for negative a*x+b. Time is discrete, indexed from 0; a finite orbit is not a general stability result. Candidate subset=[2, 3], normalized as a set. Give (modulus, a, b, normalized subset, sorted distinct image, is the image contained in the subset?).
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
The integer identity together with0≤remainder<n determines the next state.
Step identifiers and dependencies
Rule: euclidean_remainder · Uses: G001, S007
S009 · implies
Before
T(S)=[0, 8]
After
T(S)⊆S: No; exiting witnesses=[[2, 8], [3, 0]]
Conditions: none
Every image must remain in S;one explicit exit refutes invariance.The empty S satisfies the condition vacuously.
Step identifiers and dependencies
Rule: forward_invariance · Uses: G001, S008
S010 · implies
Before
x₀∈S and T(S)⊆S
After
induction keeps every later iterate in S
Conditions: none
When the condition holds,the initial state and every update stay in S,so induction gives all later iterates,not merely one arbitrary short orbit.
Step identifiers and dependencies
Rule: invariance_induction · Uses: G001, S009
Reverse checks
S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute member3: a·x+b with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute member3: a·x with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute member2: a·x+b with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute member2: a·x with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
Result
(9, 10, 6, [2, 3], [0, 8], No)
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.