Explore related knowledge and questions →
Question 1931: Candidate Value and Derivative against Two Initial Conditions On this page Original question and givens Definition and scope Step-by-step derivation Reverse checks Result This question review and source binding Return to catalogue page 10
← Question derivation index · Original question batch
This teaching derivation has second-context AI mathematical and bilingual semantic review, limited to the model and assumptions stated in this question. It has no human review or new Lean proof and does not promote the original question or MKO to Canonical truth.
R0002-01931 · q-20261013-advance-20261020-r02-ordinary-differential-equation-0081
Original question and givens The integer-coefficient polynomial candidate has ascending-power coefficients=[-4, 2, -2]. Exact checks concern only the specified point or initial conditions, not existence, uniqueness or a solution on an entire interval. x0=-2, required y0=-16, required y'0=10. Give (coefficients, x0, actual y, actual y', required y0, required y'0, first condition?, second condition?, both?).
G001 — The integer-coefficient polynomial candidate has ascending-power coefficients=[-4, 2, -2]. Exact checks concern only the specified point or initial conditions, not existence, uniqueness or a solution on an entire interval. x0=-2, required y0=-16, required y'0=10. Give (coefficients, x0, actual y, actual y', required y0, required y'0, first condition?, second condition?, both?).Definition and scope Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
Step-by-step derivation S001 · implies Before
candidate y ascending coefficients=[-4, 2, -2] After
audit point x=-2 Conditions: none
Retain the original coefficient list,including top zero terms,and audit only the specified polynomial candidate and point.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: polynomial_candidate_domain · Uses: G001
S002 · calculation Before
y′ coefficient at degree0 := mul(1, 2) After
y′ coefficient at degree0 = 2 Conditions: none
Multiply by the original degree and lower it by1;the constant term differentiates to0.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001
S003 · calculation Before
y′ coefficient at degree1 := mul(2, -2) After
y′ coefficient at degree1 = -4 Conditions: none
Multiply by the original degree and lower it by1;the constant term differentiates to0.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002
S004 · implies Before
y ascending coefficients=[-4, 2, -2] After
evaluate at x=-2 Conditions: none
Evaluate ascending coefficients by Horner from the highest nonzero term down;ignoring redundant top zero terms changes neither the function nor the retained original list.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: polynomial_evaluation_order · Uses: G001, S003
S005 · calculation Before
y Horner multiply before degree1 := mul(-2, -2) After
y Horner multiply before degree1 = 4 Conditions: none
Multiply by the same evaluation point first.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004
S006 · calculation Before
y Horner add degree1 := sum(4, 2) After
y Horner add degree1 = 6 Conditions: none
Then add the full coefficient at this position.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S005
S007 · calculation Before
y Horner multiply before degree0 := mul(6, -2) After
y Horner multiply before degree0 = -12 Conditions: none
Multiply by the same evaluation point first.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S006
S008 · calculation Before
y Horner add degree0 := sum(-12, -4) After
y Horner add degree0 = -16 Conditions: none
Then add the full coefficient at this position.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S007
S009 · implies Before
y′ ascending coefficients=[2, -4] After
evaluate at x=-2 Conditions: none
Evaluate ascending coefficients by Horner from the highest nonzero term down;ignoring redundant top zero terms changes neither the function nor the retained original list.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: polynomial_evaluation_order · Uses: G001, S008
S010 · calculation Before
y′ Horner multiply before degree0 := mul(-4, -2) After
y′ Horner multiply before degree0 = 8 Conditions: none
Multiply by the same evaluation point first.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S009
S011 · calculation Before
y′ Horner add degree0 := sum(8, 2) After
y′ Horner add degree0 = 10 Conditions: none
Then add the full coefficient at this position.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S010
S012 · implies Before
y(-2)=-16; expected=-16 After
value condition: Yes Conditions: none
Check the initial value condition first.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: initial_value_check · Uses: G001, S011
S013 · implies Before
y′(-2)=10; expected=10 After
derivative condition: Yes Conditions: none
Independently check the derivative condition rather than only one condition.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: initial_derivative_check · Uses: G001, S012
S014 · implies Before
both conditions=Yes After
initial conditions do not by themselves certify the ODE Conditions: none
Even two satisfied initial conditions do not prove that the candidate satisfies a differential equation.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: initial_not_differential_equation · Uses: G001, S013
Reverse checks S014 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S013 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S012 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute y′ Horner add degree0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute y′ Horner multiply before degree0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute y Horner add degree0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute y Horner multiply before degree0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute y Horner add degree1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute y Horner multiply before degree1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute y′ coefficient at degree1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute y′ coefficient at degree0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.Result ([-4, 2, -2], -2, -16, 10, -16, 10, Yes, Yes, Yes) The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.
Source hashes and review receipts input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50dboriginal question SHA-256: 9339d47f2f6aa82b9070509e6c4ff6e14a7cd9b2932a844c6ae6c623e42b1f06candidate record SHA-256: e9fab2a47b205763f4d417c0d71727a7dd3a08a51f3ee10a37450d513b6715e4semantic review receipt SHA-256: 340d74dcc6e37df6249594a0b79a9ee2af804337b7847478b3c1342af9722861question-first witness SHA-256: 9a06233d190d31a16f13fb03b6c3ceba4cbb748fff6c997941f66ab1888dcca8Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMEDSame-source full JSON