Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 29875: Feasible Original Indices before Objective Comparison

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 150

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0058-29875 · q-20261013-advance-20261020-r04-optimization-problem-0025

Original question and givens

Use the complete explicitly declared finite candidate list and Boolean feasible mask, with at least one feasible candidate. Preserve original zero-based indices and every tie; no unlisted or continuous-domain optimum or general complexity claim is inferred. values=[14, -4, -12, 4], feasible=[true, true, false, true]. Give (all values, feasible mask, every feasible original index).

  • G001 — Use the complete explicitly declared finite candidate list and Boolean feasible mask, with at least one feasible candidate. Preserve original zero-based indices and every tie; no unlisted or continuous-domain optimum or general complexity claim is inferred. values=[14, -4, -12, 4], feasible=[true, true, false, true]. Give (all values, feasible mask, every feasible original index).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [qf-app20-optimization-feasible-filter, optimization-feasible-filter]

After

derived = [[values, mask, feasible_indices]]

Conditions: none

Follow THIS bank exact keys,domain/frame,operation and answer role.STR22/App20 tuples differ from legacy scalars;retain or omit/1 by the ORIGINAL contract,not a generic visual convention.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: R58_EXACT_source_interface_and_answer_ROLE · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source roles = [[14, -4, -12, 4], [Yes, Yes, No, Yes]]

After

derived = [[0, 1, 3]]

Conditions: none

Require an ACTUAL Boolean mask aligned to original slots and retain zero-based indices with at least one eligible candidate.A better objective cannot change False to True,and0/1 are not Booleans.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Optimization_EXACT_Boolean_mask_ORIGINAL_zero_indices · Uses: G001, S001

Reverse checks

  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check EACH original datum,index,direction,representative and premise,not only the answer.Exact candidate checking,independent review,formal proof and publication clearance remain separate.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check EACH original datum,index,direction,representative and premise,not only the answer.Exact candidate checking,independent review,formal proof and publication clearance remain separate.

Result

([14, -4, -12, 4], [Yes, Yes, No, Yes], [0, 1, 3])

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: c2821ea01291bb8a220bfe1d10883850cbf1925e23f8149bed79a051a2512680
  • candidate record SHA-256: 6d0ebcb6cbddf0d61e73c5cc66d371976458fe848baab67b83b72c1d3f7754d5
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 66bbb31c5fe644576dfd47ac71ca9e367fc23b948eac8e3eb648d96dadea05df
  • question-first witness SHA-256: b1e4fbdbca8d0ac3581e2f26466374d870f3c8498fab7cf6873feca5bbec44e7
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON