Use only the explicitly supplied rule, symbols and finite pair table. Graph appearance supplies no values, and agreement on the listed inputs proves no equivalence on unlisted domains. Points=[[1, 7], [2, 8]]. Normalize tuple collections by removing identical tuples and sorting their JSON strings with the source’s en-locale comparison. This is canonical record order, not numerical coordinate order; number any output rows from 0 only after that normalization. Require exactly two distinct pairs with different x-coordinates. Give (canonical points,reduced rational slope,intercept), with no /1 for integer results.
G001 — Use only the explicitly supplied rule, symbols and finite pair table. Graph appearance supplies no values, and agreement on the listed inputs proves no equivalence on unlisted domains. Points=[[1, 7], [2, 8]]. Normalize tuple collections by removing identical tuples and sorting their JSON strings with the source’s en-locale comparison. This is canonical record order, not numerical coordinate order; number any output rows from 0 only after that normalization. Require exactly two distinct pairs with different x-coordinates. Give (canonical points,reduced rational slope,intercept), with no /1 for integer results.
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
two distinct x-coordinates and an affine rule ax+b
After
unique affine coefficients=(1,6)
Conditions: none
Subtracting two affine fits gives(a−a′)(x₂−x₁)=0,so a=a′ and b=b′;without the affine restriction,other interpolants are possible.
Step identifiers and dependencies
Rule: affine_model_uniqueness · Uses: G001, S012
Reverse checks
S013 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S012 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute reverse x=2 ax+b with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute reverse x=2 ax with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute reverse x=1 ax+b with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute reverse x=1 ax with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute intercept with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute slope times x₁ with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute slope with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute y₂−y₁ with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute x₂−x₁ with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
Result
([[1, 7], [2, 8]], 1, 6)
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.