Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 2653: Repeated Inputs versus a Single-Valued Pair Table

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 14

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0004-02653 · q-20261013-advance-20261021-r01-mathematical-representation-0053

Original question and givens

Use only the explicitly supplied rule, symbols and finite pair table. Graph appearance supplies no values, and agreement on the listed inputs proves no equivalence on unlisted domains. Pairs=[[0, -10], [1, -9], [1, -9], [2, -1]]. Normalize tuple collections by removing identical tuples and sorting their JSON strings with the source’s en-locale comparison. This is canonical record order, not numerical coordinate order; number any output rows from 0 only after that normalization. Give (canonical pairs,sorted distinct domain,inputs having multiple distinct outputs,is the table a function on its domain?). List conflicts in first-appearance order in the canonical pair table.

  • G001 — Use only the explicitly supplied rule, symbols and finite pair table. Graph appearance supplies no values, and agreement on the listed inputs proves no equivalence on unlisted domains. Pairs=[[0, -10], [1, -9], [1, -9], [2, -1]]. Normalize tuple collections by removing identical tuples and sorting their JSON strings with the source’s en-locale comparison. This is canonical record order, not numerical coordinate order; number any output rows from 0 only after that normalization. Give (canonical pairs,sorted distinct domain,inputs having multiple distinct outputs,is the table a function on its domain?). List conflicts in first-appearance order in the canonical pair table.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

declared symbolic rule or complete finite table

After

keep the stated domain and representation distinct

Conditions: none

Use only the declared rule or table;agreement on a finite table alone does not establish function equality on an unlisted domain.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: representation_scope · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

input=0; distinct outputs=[-10]

After

one output=Yes

Conditions: none

Different outputs for the same input violate a function table;duplicate identical pairs are removed and are not a conflict.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: single_valued_fiber_audit · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

input=1; distinct outputs=[-9]

After

one output=Yes

Conditions: none

Different outputs for the same input violate a function table;duplicate identical pairs are removed and are not a conflict.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: single_valued_fiber_audit · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

input=2; distinct outputs=[-1]

After

one output=Yes

Conditions: none

Different outputs for the same input violate a function table;duplicate identical pairs are removed and are not a conflict.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: single_valued_fiber_audit · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

[]

After

function on listed domain=Yes

Conditions: none

Judge single-valuedness on the listed domain;do not invent a larger domain requiring additional values.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: listed_domain_function_verdict · Uses: G001, S004

Reverse checks

  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([[0, -10], [1, -9], [2, -1]], [0, 1, 2], [], Yes)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 355ada3eb938782025aa03b99205f8eff400f7379a9a5768e44074217b2ecb9c
  • candidate record SHA-256: d5439011795f4495dbc0e0efa7def146c31a1836b26bfa87468a06a5105f521c
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 312ae86315346b8955842a547cb2d09246e1f826755f72c2a51f042e5c7d5c56
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 831f449ed41ff9144a290e534aa32adf7252d15b81c16ed5886a7dfd65dee70c
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON