Explore related knowledge and questions →
Question 2281: Value and Slope Initial Data as Separate Conditions On this page Original question and givens Definition and scope Step-by-step derivation Reverse checks Result This question review and source binding Return to catalogue page 12
← Question derivation index · Original question batch
This teaching derivation has second-context AI mathematical and bilingual semantic review, limited to the model and assumptions stated in this question. It has no human review or new Lean proof and does not promote the original question or MKO to Canonical truth.
R0003-02281 · q-20261013-advance-20261021-r04-initial-value-problem-0031
Original question and givens Use the integer polynomial candidate with ascending-power coefficients=[-5, 2, -2]. Initial data and ODE residuals are separate obligations. Neither a finite grid nor an initial-value match proves existence, uniqueness, a general solution or an identity on an entire interval. x0=-2, required y0=-17, required y_prime0=10. Give (coefficients,x0,y(x0),y'(x0),required y0,required y_prime0,value match?,derivative match?,both?).
G001 — Use the integer polynomial candidate with ascending-power coefficients=[-5, 2, -2]. Initial data and ODE residuals are separate obligations. Neither a finite grid nor an initial-value match proves existence, uniqueness, a general solution or an identity on an entire interval. x0=-2, required y0=-17, required y_prime0=10. Give (coefficients,x0,y(x0),y'(x0),required y0,required y_prime0,value match?,derivative match?,both?).Definition and scope Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
Step-by-step derivation S001 · implies Before
candidate polynomial ascending coefficients=[-5, 2, -2] After
initial point=-2; required y₀=-17 Conditions: none
Retain the polynomial and initial data;the residual grid need not contain the initial point,so evaluate it separately.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: candidate_IVP_data · Uses: G001
S002 · calculation Before
y′ coefficient at degree0 := mul(1, 2) After
y′ coefficient at degree0 = 2 Conditions: none
Multiply by the original degree and lower it by1;the constant term differentiates to0.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001
S003 · calculation Before
y′ coefficient at degree1 := mul(2, -2) After
y′ coefficient at degree1 = -4 Conditions: none
Multiply by the original degree and lower it by1;the constant term differentiates to0.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002
S004 · implies Before
initial y ascending coefficients=[-5, 2, -2] After
evaluate at x=-2 Conditions: none
Evaluate ascending coefficients by Horner from the highest nonzero term down;ignoring redundant top zero terms changes neither the function nor the retained original list.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: polynomial_evaluation_order · Uses: G001, S003
S005 · calculation Before
initial y Horner multiply before degree1 := mul(-2, -2) After
initial y Horner multiply before degree1 = 4 Conditions: none
Multiply by the same evaluation point first.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004
S006 · calculation Before
initial y Horner add degree1 := sum(4, 2) After
initial y Horner add degree1 = 6 Conditions: none
Then add the full coefficient at this position.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S005
S007 · calculation Before
initial y Horner multiply before degree0 := mul(6, -2) After
initial y Horner multiply before degree0 = -12 Conditions: none
Multiply by the same evaluation point first.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S006
S008 · calculation Before
initial y Horner add degree0 := sum(-12, -5) After
initial y Horner add degree0 = -17 Conditions: none
Then add the full coefficient at this position.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S007
S009 · implies Before
initial y′ ascending coefficients=[2, -4] After
evaluate at x=-2 Conditions: none
Evaluate ascending coefficients by Horner from the highest nonzero term down;ignoring redundant top zero terms changes neither the function nor the retained original list.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: polynomial_evaluation_order · Uses: G001, S008
S010 · calculation Before
initial y′ Horner multiply before degree0 := mul(-4, -2) After
initial y′ Horner multiply before degree0 = 8 Conditions: none
Multiply by the same evaluation point first.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S009
S011 · calculation Before
initial y′ Horner add degree0 := sum(8, 2) After
initial y′ Horner add degree0 = 10 Conditions: none
Then add the full coefficient at this position.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S010
S012 · implies Before
y(-2)=-17; required=-17 After
value condition=Yes Conditions: none
Compare the actual function value at the initial point,not another grid point.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: initial_value_condition · Uses: G001, S011
S013 · implies Before
y′(-2)=10; required=10 After
derivative condition=Yes Conditions: none
Second-order initial data also require the derivative condition;the two conditions cannot replace one another.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: initial_derivative_condition · Uses: G001, S012
S014 · implies Before
initial data agree or disagree After
no differential-equation assertion from initial data alone Conditions: none
Matching initial data do not by themselves check the differential equation or prove an existence-uniqueness theorem.
Step identifiers and dependencies Rule: initial_only_scope · Uses: G001, S013
Reverse checks S014 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S013 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S012 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute initial y′ Horner add degree0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute initial y′ Horner multiply before degree0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute initial y Horner add degree0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute initial y Horner multiply before degree0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute initial y Horner add degree1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute initial y Horner multiply before degree1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute y′ coefficient at degree1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute y′ coefficient at degree0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.Result ([-5, 2, -2], -2, -17, 10, -17, 10, Yes, Yes, Yes) The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.
Source hashes and review receipts input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50dboriginal question SHA-256: b38287aeba080a46f39849005311980532e4d890aefe182bbf66bfd1e4e62798candidate record SHA-256: 56a5e1747e0a88fd455400744aa1e2c9985184e78806125c8c237e69140403cbsemantic review receipt SHA-256: 5dbc70ebd5f74b23384c93b63a2b1d6519e206c79f22ae16a6c2d7483cea783fquestion-first witness SHA-256: cf121c8dd2fec13aa118b04b049ee39494f1d6d9ecdc13514cafb78c0fc021faLean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMEDSame-source full JSON