Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 2071: One Sign-Bracket Update with Explicit Endpoint-Zero Priority

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 11

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0003-02071 · q-20261013-advance-20261021-r05-bisection-method-0046

Original question and givens

Use only the supplied exact rational endpoints and declared signs in {-1,0,1}. Normalize rational results to reduced fractions with positive denominators, omitting /1 for integers. Sign data and width-halving do not establish root existence or convergence to a root; a separate theorem and its hypotheses would be required. left=20/1, right=24/1, signs left=-1, midpoint=0, right=1. Require a qualified ordered bracket. Give (left,right,left sign,midpoint sign,right sign,midpoint,next [left,right,left sign,right sign]). Test a zero left endpoint first, then a zero right endpoint, then a zero midpoint; a detected zero collapses to that point. Otherwise retain the half with opposite endpoint signs.

  • G001 — Use only the supplied exact rational endpoints and declared signs in {-1,0,1}. Normalize rational results to reduced fractions with positive denominators, omitting /1 for integers. Sign data and width-halving do not establish root existence or convergence to a root; a separate theorem and its hypotheses would be required. left=20/1, right=24/1, signs left=-1, midpoint=0, right=1. Require a qualified ordered bracket. Give (left,right,left sign,midpoint sign,right sign,midpoint,next [left,right,left sign,right sign]). Test a zero left endpoint first, then a zero right endpoint, then a zero midpoint; a detected zero collapses to that point. Otherwise retain the half with opposite endpoint signs.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

left=20<right=24

After

all endpoints and midpoints are exact rationals

Conditions: none

Check strict endpoint order first;these are supplied data,not observations from an evaluated unknown function.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: ordered_bracket_data · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

left sign=-1; right sign=1

After

declared sign-bracket condition=Yes

Conditions: none

The criterion is a zero endpoint sign or opposite nonzero signs,not interval length.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: recorded_sign_qualification · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

single endpoint sum := sum(20, 24)

After

single endpoint sum = 44

Conditions: none

Add the complete endpoints first.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

single midpoint := div(44, 2)

After

single midpoint = 22

Conditions: none

Then divide by2 without truncating or rounding an endpoint.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

endpoint signs=(-1,1); midpoint=22, recorded sign=0

After

priority decision=mid_root; next bracket=[22, 22, 0, 0]

Conditions: none

Handle recorded endpoint zeros before a midpoint zero;otherwise retain the half with opposite endpoint signs.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: single_bracket_update · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

[22, 22, 0, 0]

After

a recorded zero stops at a singleton;no division by a singleton width

Conditions: none

A zero is processed from the given record,not a claimed new evaluation of the unknown function;do not update a collapsed interval as if it were strict.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: zero_stop_boundary · Uses: G001, S005

Reverse checks

  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute single midpoint with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute single endpoint sum with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(20, 24, -1, 0, 1, 22, [22, 22, 0, 0])

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: b6b6d4e13b69e53d59fc8e98c419e787af99d2bed3d58b035a516e4e36eebcf6
  • candidate record SHA-256: 8e728305b3a7dbc7e4f3dc8fb0ae6a9bc0514cc1c656a58aecfd9783068832a9
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 5dbc70ebd5f74b23384c93b63a2b1d6519e206c79f22ae16a6c2d7483cea783f
  • question-first witness SHA-256: cf121c8dd2fec13aa118b04b049ee39494f1d6d9ecdc13514cafb78c0fc021fa
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON