Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 2028: A Finite Trace Stops at the First Declared Zero Midpoint

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 11

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0003-02028 · q-20261013-advance-20261021-r05-bisection-method-0053

Original question and givens

Use only the supplied exact rational endpoints and declared signs in {-1,0,1}. Normalize rational results to reduced fractions with positive denominators, omitting /1 for integers. Sign data and width-halving do not establish root existence or convergence to a root; a separate theorem and its hypotheses would be required. initial left=2/1, right=6/1, nonzero opposite endpoint signs=-1, 1; midpoint-sign list=[1, 1, 1]. Give (initial left,initial right,initial left sign,initial right sign,entire supplied sign list,every performed [left,right,midpoint,midpoint sign,next left,next right] row,final left,final right). Stop at the first zero midpoint and retain unused signs only in the original input-list field; an empty list performs no update.

  • G001 — Use only the supplied exact rational endpoints and declared signs in {-1,0,1}. Normalize rational results to reduced fractions with positive denominators, omitting /1 for integers. Sign data and width-halving do not establish root existence or convergence to a root; a separate theorem and its hypotheses would be required. initial left=2/1, right=6/1, nonzero opposite endpoint signs=-1, 1; midpoint-sign list=[1, 1, 1]. Give (initial left,initial right,initial left sign,initial right sign,entire supplied sign list,every performed [left,right,midpoint,midpoint sign,next left,next right] row,final left,final right). Stop at the first zero midpoint and retain unused signs only in the original input-list field; an empty list performs no update.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

left=2<right=6

After

all endpoints and midpoints are exact rationals

Conditions: none

Check strict endpoint order first;these are supplied data,not observations from an evaluated unknown function.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: ordered_bracket_data · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

left sign=-1; right sign=1

After

declared sign-bracket condition=Yes

Conditions: none

The criterion is a zero endpoint sign or opposite nonzero signs,not interval length.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: recorded_sign_qualification · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

update1 endpoint sum := sum(2, 6)

After

update1 endpoint sum = 8

Conditions: none

Add the complete endpoints first.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

update1 midpoint := div(8, 2)

After

update1 midpoint = 4

Conditions: none

Then divide by2 without truncating or rounding an endpoint.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

recorded midpoint sign[0]=1

After

left_half: (2,6) becomes (2,4)

Conditions: none

The next update uses the newly retained endpoints and signs,not the initial interval again.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: trace_state_transition · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · calculation

Before

update2 endpoint sum := sum(2, 4)

After

update2 endpoint sum = 6

Conditions: none

Add the complete endpoints first.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · calculation

Before

update2 midpoint := div(6, 2)

After

update2 midpoint = 3

Conditions: none

Then divide by2 without truncating or rounding an endpoint.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · implies

Before

recorded midpoint sign[1]=1

After

left_half: (2,4) becomes (2,3)

Conditions: none

The next update uses the newly retained endpoints and signs,not the initial interval again.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: trace_state_transition · Uses: G001, S007

S009 · calculation

Before

update3 endpoint sum := sum(2, 3)

After

update3 endpoint sum = 5

Conditions: none

Add the complete endpoints first.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S008

S010 · calculation

Before

update3 midpoint := div(5, 2)

After

update3 midpoint = 5/2

Conditions: none

Then divide by2 without truncating or rounding an endpoint.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S009

S011 · implies

Before

recorded midpoint sign[2]=1

After

left_half: (2,3) becomes (2,5/2)

Conditions: none

The next update uses the newly retained endpoints and signs,not the initial interval again.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: trace_state_transition · Uses: G001, S010

S012 · implies

Before

processed updates=3; supplied signs=3

After

final interval=(2,5/2)

Conditions: none

Stop immediately at a zero midpoint;later unused input signs remain in the source but create no fictitious updates.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_trace_termination · Uses: G001, S011

S013 · implies

Before

the requested finite sign trace

After

no automatic continuity or general convergence proof

Conditions: none

This is a finite control-flow and exact-endpoint calculation,not a complete function certificate.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_trace_scope · Uses: G001, S012

Reverse checks

  • S013 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S012 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute update3 midpoint with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute update3 endpoint sum with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute update2 midpoint with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute update2 endpoint sum with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute update1 midpoint with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute update1 endpoint sum with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(2, 6, -1, 1, [1, 1, 1], [[2, 6, 4, 1, 2, 4], [2, 4, 3, 1, 2, 3], [2, 3, 5/2, 1, 2, 5/2]], 2, 5/2)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: e98f1e4254d371b272193213d4803c5badbc2347b93f346988f8bacb39f5a3a1
  • candidate record SHA-256: 460cb549a89f88567575cf70c239dbf7b5bc2dbc39952156b81d731b63597651
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 5dbc70ebd5f74b23384c93b63a2b1d6519e206c79f22ae16a6c2d7483cea783f
  • question-first witness SHA-256: cf121c8dd2fec13aa118b04b049ee39494f1d6d9ecdc13514cafb78c0fc021fa
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON