Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 2389: One Exact Capacity-Limited Discrete Increment

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 12

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0003-02389 · q-20261013-advance-20261021-r07-discrete-logistic-growth-0014

Original question and givens

Use exactly the fixed discrete increment model next=x+r*x*(1−x/K), with K>0, 0≤r≤1 and 0≤x≤K, at fixed time steps. Reduce exact rational outputs and omit /1 for integers. This is neither another logistic-map convention nor a continuous logistic solution; a finite orbit proves no stability, convergence or empirical population fit. current=13/5, rate=3/4, capacity=8/1. Give (current,rate,capacity,next).

  • G001 — Use exactly the fixed discrete increment model next=x+r*x*(1−x/K), with K>0, 0≤r≤1 and 0≤x≤K, at fixed time steps. Reduce exact rational outputs and omit /1 for integers. This is neither another logistic-map convention nor a continuous logistic solution; a finite orbit proves no stability, convergence or empirical population fit. current=13/5, rate=3/4, capacity=8/1. Give (current,rate,capacity,next).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

0≤r=3/4≤1; K=8>0; 0≤x=13/5≤K

After

T(x)=x+r·x·(1−x/K)

Conditions: none

This fixed model adds the increment to the old state;it is not the different direct-product map r·x·(1−x/K).

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: logistic_increment_model · Uses: G001

S002 · calculation

Before

x/K at step1 := div(13/5, 8)

After

x/K at step1 = 13/40

Conditions: none

Positive K permits normalization of the state.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

1−x/K at step1 := sub(1, 13/40)

After

1−x/K at step1 = 27/40

Conditions: none

This feedback factor is nonnegative in the declared interval.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

x(1−x/K) at step1 := mul(13/5, 27/40)

After

x(1−x/K) at step1 = 351/200

Conditions: none

Multiply the current state by the remaining proportion first.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

increment at step1 := mul(3/4, 351/200)

After

increment at step1 = 1053/800

Conditions: none

Then multiply by the increment rate r.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · calculation

Before

next state at step1 := sum(13/5, 1053/800)

After

next state at step1 = 3133/800

Conditions: none

Add the original x back;the addition must not be omitted.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · implies

Before

T(x)−x=r·x·(1−x/K)≥0; K−T(x)=(K−x)(1−r·x/K)≥0

After

0≤3133/800≤8

Conditions: none

The factor inequalities follow from0≤r≤1 and0≤x≤K,proving interval preservation for this model rather than guessing from samples.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: qualified_interval_preservation · Uses: G001, S006

Reverse checks

  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute next state at step1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute increment at step1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute x(1−x/K) at step1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute 1−x/K at step1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute x/K at step1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(13/5, 3/4, 8, 3133/800)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 7da7227506c626552563068a095186609f4393dfafd9cae2630024b244465f8a
  • candidate record SHA-256: 3d8601d0a86a47cf71c4e363e5d71855342171b73513e2158487e7a6b35a83da
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 5dbc70ebd5f74b23384c93b63a2b1d6519e206c79f22ae16a6c2d7483cea783f
  • question-first witness SHA-256: cf121c8dd2fec13aa118b04b049ee39494f1d6d9ecdc13514cafb78c0fc021fa
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON