Use exactly the fixed discrete increment model next=x+r*x*(1−x/K), with K>0, 0≤r≤1 and 0≤x≤K, at fixed time steps. Reduce exact rational outputs and omit /1 for integers. This is neither another logistic-map convention nor a continuous logistic solution; a finite orbit proves no stability, convergence or empirical population fit. initial=6/25, rate=1/4, capacity=6/1, updates=0. Give (initial,rate,capacity,update count,orbit including initial). With zero updates retain just the initial value.
G001 — Use exactly the fixed discrete increment model next=x+r*x*(1−x/K), with K>0, 0≤r≤1 and 0≤x≤K, at fixed time steps. Reduce exact rational outputs and omit /1 for integers. This is neither another logistic-map convention nor a continuous logistic solution; a finite orbit proves no stability, convergence or empirical population fit. initial=6/25, rate=1/4, capacity=6/1, updates=0. Give (initial,rate,capacity,update count,orbit including initial). With zero updates retain just the initial value.
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
This fixed model adds the increment to the old state;it is not the different direct-product map r·x·(1−x/K).
Step identifiers and dependencies
Rule: logistic_increment_model · Uses: G001
S002 · implies
Before
initial=6/25; steps=0
After
retain the initial state before updating
Conditions: none
A zero-transition prefix still contains its initial state.
Step identifiers and dependencies
Rule: logistic_orbit_initial · Uses: G001, S001
S003 · implies
Before
orbit=[6/25]
After
entries=1=steps+1
Conditions: none
This is an exact finite orbit,not a stability proof,empirical prediction or model-fit evidence.
Step identifiers and dependencies
Rule: logistic_prefix_scope · Uses: G001, S002
Reverse checks
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
Result
(6/25, 1/4, 6, 0, [6/25])
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.