Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 29441: Positive Mass and Spring as Oscillator Model Qualifications

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 148

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0057-29441 · q-20261013-advance-20261022-r01-harmonic-oscillator-model-0016

Original question and givens

Use the undamped linear oscillator model m*x''+k*x=0, with mass m=-1/1 and spring coefficient k=7/1. Use exact rationals, normalize denominator signs, reduce fractions and omit /1 for integer outputs. Positive m and k qualify this model; this slice establishes no sin/cos closed-form solution or stability theorem. This qualification family also admits nonpositive candidates so they can be rejected. Give (normalized mass,normalized spring,mass positive?,spring positive?,both positive?).

  • G001 — Use the undamped linear oscillator model m*x''+k*x=0, with mass m=-1/1 and spring coefficient k=7/1. Use exact rationals, normalize denominator signs, reduce fractions and omit /1 for integer outputs. Positive m and k qualify this model; this slice establishes no sin/cos closed-form solution or stability theorem. This qualification family also admits nonpositive candidates so they can be rejected. Give (normalized mass,normalized spring,mass positive?,spring positive?,both positive?).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [qf-str22-oscillator-model-qualification, oscillator-model-qualification]

After

derived = [[mass, spring, mass_positive, spring_positive, qualified]]

Conditions: none

Use this bank exact ordered tuple and hyphenated operation.Rational outputs reduce with positive denominators and OMIT/1 for integers,unlike the preceding legacy bank.Do not change original bilingual snapshots or meaning.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: STR22_exact_interface_and_source_ORDERED_tuple_roles · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source roles = [Oscillator mass, [-1, 1]]

After

derived = [-1, -1, 1]

Conditions: none

A raw rational is a PAIR with each component within±1e6 and nonzero denominator.Normalize denominator sign and gcd.Do not accept a scalar or reduce before checking the RAW input bounds.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: STR22_RAW_rational_PAIR_profile_and_sign_gcd_normalization · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

source roles = [Oscillator spring, [7, 1]]

After

derived = [7, 7, 1]

Conditions: none

A raw rational is a PAIR with each component within±1e6 and nonzero denominator.Normalize denominator sign and gcd.Do not accept a scalar or reduce before checking the RAW input bounds.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: STR22_RAW_rational_PAIR_profile_and_sign_gcd_normalization · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

source roles = [-1, 7]

After

derived = [[No, Yes], No]

Conditions: none

For the undamped linear oscillator m*x_second+k*x=0 require BOTH m,k strictly positive.Qualification may legally contain0/negative candidates;do not repair them with abs or replacement.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Oscillator_BOTH_strict_model_qualifications_not_repaired · Uses: G001, S003

Reverse checks

  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check every ORIGINAL coordinate/table entry/alignment and strict premise,not just the final answer.Keep finite candidates,general reasoning,formal proof and publication responsibilities distinct.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check every ORIGINAL coordinate/table entry/alignment and strict premise,not just the final answer.Keep finite candidates,general reasoning,formal proof and publication responsibilities distinct.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check every ORIGINAL coordinate/table entry/alignment and strict premise,not just the final answer.Keep finite candidates,general reasoning,formal proof and publication responsibilities distinct.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check every ORIGINAL coordinate/table entry/alignment and strict premise,not just the final answer.Keep finite candidates,general reasoning,formal proof and publication responsibilities distinct.

Result

(-1, 7, No, Yes, No)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: e73a954d9470c3fde8b93c3da377cd9add7fc97f71f51b122d73df0dd3cdc4f0
  • candidate record SHA-256: 512af1fa8a9648d23dadf40654312e9de29feb2b8c1a08092dc74f747477cfab
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: db445bb0caa8a249fcf78eadd2550b49b820e279cc80b2327f0d757d3ae920b6
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 58d12a50ea9943c50b65927607347101b1ddaf692d62e091f2cae8a9f0362eb5
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON