Use carriers Fin(4) and Fin(4), complete total mapping=[0, 3, 0, 0] indexed by source labels, and target event=[0, 1] normalized to sorted distinct labels. Give (source size,target size,mapping,event,all source labels mapping into the event). This family computes a preimage without claiming a sigma-algebra qualification.
G001 — Use carriers Fin(4) and Fin(4), complete total mapping=[0, 3, 0, 0] indexed by source labels, and target event=[0, 1] normalized to sorted distinct labels. Give (source size,target size,mapping,event,all source labels mapping into the event). This family computes a preimage without claiming a sigma-algebra qualification.
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
raw target event=[0, 1];mapping=[0, 3, 0, 0];source Fin(4);target Fin(4)
After
sorted distinct target event=[0, 1]
Conditions: none
Normalize only the target event as a sorted set.Keep the total map indexed by source.This exercise has no sigma-algebra premise and computes a set preimage only,not measurability.
S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
Result
(4, 4, [0, 3, 0, 0], [0, 1], [0, 2, 3])
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.