Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 11310: Row-Stochastic Qualification before Any Markov Step

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 57

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0021-11310 · q-20261013-advance-20261024-r03-finite-markov-chain-0010

Original question and givens

Use one fixed finite time-homogeneous transition table=[[5/6, 1/6], [11/13, 2/13]]. Rows denote the current state and columns the next state; row entries must be nonnegative and sum exactly to 1 before stepping. State order stays fixed. Use exact rational arithmetic, reduce fractions to positive denominators and omit /1 for integer outputs. No stationary, irreducibility, ergodicity or long-term convergence claim follows. This qualification family also admits negative or non-unit-row candidate entries for rejection. Give (size,normalized transition table,all entries nonnegative?,exact row sums,row-stochastic?,rows=current state, columns=next state).

  • G001 — Use one fixed finite time-homogeneous transition table=[[5/6, 1/6], [11/13, 2/13]]. Rows denote the current state and columns the next state; row entries must be nonnegative and sum exactly to 1 before stepping. State order stays fixed. Use exact rational arithmetic, reduce fractions to positive denominators and omit /1 for integer outputs. No stationary, irreducibility, ergodicity or long-term convergence claim follows. This qualification family also admits negative or non-unit-row candidate entries for rejection. Give (size,normalized transition table,all entries nonnegative?,exact row sums,row-stochastic?,rows=current state, columns=next state).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

transition row0:raw rational pairs=[[5, 6], [1, 6]]

After

transition row0:normalized=[5/6, 1/6]

Conditions: none

Every original denominator must be nonzero.Reduce fractions to positive denominators without decimal approximation.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_weight_normalization · Uses: G001

S002 · calculation

Before

transition row0 total := sum(5/6, 1/6)

After

transition row0 total = 1

Conditions: none

Compute exactly with this step's specified roles,retaining signs,denominators and original pairings.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

transition row0:weights=[5/6, 1/6];sum=1

After

nonnegative=Yes;total_one=Yes;qualified=Yes

Conditions: none

Check nonnegativity and exact total one separately.Zero weights are allowed;negative weights or near-one totals are not repaired.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: separate_weight_guards · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

transition row1:raw rational pairs=[[11, 13], [2, 13]]

After

transition row1:normalized=[11/13, 2/13]

Conditions: none

Every original denominator must be nonzero.Reduce fractions to positive denominators without decimal approximation.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_weight_normalization · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

transition row1 total := sum(11/13, 2/13)

After

transition row1 total = 1

Conditions: none

Compute exactly with this step's specified roles,retaining signs,denominators and original pairings.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

transition row1:weights=[11/13, 2/13];sum=1

After

nonnegative=Yes;total_one=Yes;qualified=Yes

Conditions: none

Check nonnegativity and exact total one separately.Zero weights are allowed;negative weights or near-one totals are not repaired.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: separate_weight_guards · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · implies

Before

complete transition matrix=[[5/6, 1/6], [11/13, 2/13]];row sums=[1, 1]

After

nonnegative=Yes;row_stochastic=Yes;rows=current state, columns=next state

Conditions: none

Every complete row must be nonnegative with exact sum1;column sums are not the convention.This fixed time-homogeneous Markov model gives no stationary,ergodic or long-term convergence theorem.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: whole_row_stochastic_kernel_convention · Uses: G001, S006

Reverse checks

  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute transition row1 total with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute transition row0 total with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(2, [[5/6, 1/6], [11/13, 2/13]], Yes, [1, 1], Yes, rows=current state, columns=next state)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 02c2d9fe2f5acd5877c48fb1f17a38f09314b9f623c57920d2cc455836bed137
  • candidate record SHA-256: c6e3d4da7cbf34aa459873ce5e214c33a08c5f313f3835438060113ed75c0879
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 47d23d3735987d68e27733b051bdfa80a3616d44fb223b82bf2e6c8e46d49258
  • question-first witness SHA-256: a857db558000724020d2d5e815cb6bc3e2c9e2933df295bf33eb478d3c695139
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON