Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 11633: A Symbolic Heat Residual Identity, Not a Point Sample

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 59

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0022-11633 · q-20261013-advance-20261024-r06-partial-differential-equation-0083

Original question and givens

Use the explicit linear constant-coefficient PDE operator and polynomial candidate coefficients=[-5, 0, 16, 2, 0, 0] in order [1,x,y,x²,x*y,y²]. Fix the operator convention before evaluating residuals. A point residual proves only a point check; general solution, existence, uniqueness and well-posedness remain separate obligations. Here y is time, x is space and positive integer diffusivity=4. The equation is u_y=diffusivity*u_xx. Test the residual identically as a polynomial, not only at sampled points. Give (coefficients,diffusivity,residual coefficients in basis [1,x,y],all residual coefficients zero?). The residual coefficients are [c_y−2*diffusivity*c_xx,c_xy,2*c_yy].

  • G001 — Use the explicit linear constant-coefficient PDE operator and polynomial candidate coefficients=[-5, 0, 16, 2, 0, 0] in order [1,x,y,x²,x*y,y²]. Fix the operator convention before evaluating residuals. A point residual proves only a point check; general solution, existence, uniqueness and well-posedness remain separate obligations. Here y is time, x is space and positive integer diffusivity=4. The equation is u_y=diffusivity*u_xx. Test the residual identically as a polynomial, not only at sampled points. Give (coefficients,diffusivity,residual coefficients in basis [1,x,y],all residual coefficients zero?). The residual coefficients are [c_y−2*diffusivity*c_xx,c_xy,2*c_yy].

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

original coefficients=[-5, 0, 16, 2, 0, 0];basis=[1,x,y,x^2,xy,y^2]

After

u(x,y)=(-5)+(0)*x+(16)*y+(2)*x^2+(0)*x*y+(0)*y^2

Conditions: none

Read the six coefficients in their fixed monomial order,not the descending[a,b,c] order of a univariate quadratic.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: bivariate_scalar_polynomial_basis_roles · Uses: G001

S002 · calculation

Before

u_xx constant := mul(2, 2)

After

u_xx constant = 4

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from this step's original roles and established intermediates,retaining signs,denominators and coefficient order.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

u_yy constant := mul(2, 0)

After

u_yy constant = 0

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from this step's original roles and established intermediates,retaining signs,denominators and coefficient order.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

u coefficients=[-5, 0, 16, 2, 0, 0];u_x=c1+2*c3*x+c4*y;u_y=c2+c4*x+2*c5*y

After

u_xx=4;u_xy=0;u_yy=0

Conditions: none

Differentiate each monomial by fixed-coordinate slice rules.The linear x term differentiates to a constant,and xy contributes c4 to u_xy.These are polynomial identities,not an assumed general mixed-partial exchange theorem.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: polynomial_second_partials_explicit_monomials · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

heat diffusivity times u_xx := mul(4, 4)

After

heat diffusivity times u_xx = 16

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from this step's original roles and established intermediates,retaining signs,denominators and coefficient order.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · calculation

Before

heat constant residual := sub(16, 16)

After

heat constant residual = 0

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from this step's original roles and established intermediates,retaining signs,denominators and coefficient order.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · implies

Before

u_y=(16)+(0)*x+(0)*y;diffusivity*u_xx=16

After

residual coefficients in [1,x,y]=[0, 0, 0];identically zero=Yes

Conditions: none

Here y is time and x is space.Collect the whole residual u_y−d*u_xx in[1,x,y].Linear independence of monomials makes all-zero coefficients equivalent to the polynomial identity.A nonzero coefficient cannot be repaired by cancellation at a sampled point.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: heat_residual_coefficient_identity_not_samples · Uses: G001, S006

Reverse checks

  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute heat constant residual with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute heat diffusivity times u_xx with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute u_yy constant with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute u_xx constant with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([-5, 0, 16, 2, 0, 0], 4, [0, 0, 0], Yes)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: b64ac825240f7ab6f455f635a53862b12f72969c286dc15612168bbb4b75299d
  • candidate record SHA-256: a2857b1fcc5ac38ef62e4c60734a91f1d2c427d3b7bba70e8fbb3c340152b5f7
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 94ec4350cf8b5e5c6c7701d536126eef20acb3a213e873ace4f5346d256b8fac
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 0beba165ffd367a7c96de3aa58344d572d01434cd2ef772fbb00342c1f50b01b
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON