Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 11821: An Affine Jensen Identity on a Qualified Interval

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 60

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0022-11821 · q-20261013-advance-20261025-r02-convex-function-0046

Original question and givens

Use f(t)=a*t+b with coefficients [a,b]=[8, -2] and interval=[-22, 23]. Give (coefficients,interval,ordered nonempty domain?,f(lambda*x+(1-lambda)*y)=lambda*f(x)+(1-lambda)*f(y),qualified convex certificate?). A singleton is allowed; a reversed interval record is unqualified. A positive convexity certificate must cover all endpoint pairs in the convex domain and every lambda in [0,1]. One Jensen violation can refute convexity, but one successful instance cannot prove it.

  • G001 — Use f(t)=a*t+b with coefficients [a,b]=[8, -2] and interval=[-22, 23]. Give (coefficients,interval,ordered nonempty domain?,f(lambda*x+(1-lambda)*y)=lambda*f(x)+(1-lambda)*f(y),qualified convex certificate?). A singleton is allowed; a reversed interval record is unqualified. A positive convexity certificate must cover all endpoint pairs in the convex domain and every lambda in [0,1]. One Jensen violation can refute convexity, but one successful instance cannot prove it.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

declared interval record=[-22, 23]

After

ordered_nonempty=Yes;nondegenerate=Yes

Conditions: none

This nonempty-interval protocol uses lower≤upper;the nondegenerate certificate additionally needs lower<upper.A reversed record is unqualified,not a declaration that the abstract empty set is nonconvex.A singleton interval is convex.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: interval_certificate_qualification_not_empty_set_nonconvexity · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

arbitrary x,y in [-22,23];0<=lambda<=1;z=lambda*x+(1-lambda)*y

After

z--22=lambda*(x--22)+(1-lambda)*(y--22)>=0;23-z=lambda*(23-x)+(1-lambda)*(23-y)>=0

Conditions: none

Both slacks are nonnegative sums,hence lower≤z≤upper for every endpoint pair and every permitted lambda.No sampling is used;endpoints and singleton cases are included.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: interval_all_segments_slack_identity · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

f(t)=(8)*t+(-2);z=lambda*x+(1-lambda)*y

After

f(z)=lambda*((8)*x+(-2))+(1-lambda)*((8)*y+(-2))

Conditions: none

Distributivity and lambda+(1−lambda)=1 give the affine Jensen identity,hence equality for every endpoint pair and weight on a qualified convex domain.An unqualified domain record does not invalidate the algebraic identity.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: affine_distributive_all_weights_identity · Uses: G001, S002

Reverse checks

  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([8, -2], [-22, 23], Yes, f(lambda*x+(1-lambda)*y)=lambda*f(x)+(1-lambda)*f(y), Yes)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 0ead8ebb0daf872b2238a018304442e22a2459e110eb91f90ebbea7ec26407fb
  • candidate record SHA-256: 230405b31ccc4f12cec6ad46f8301a833107d55b3bb38f6073ef747ebb666a16
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 94ec4350cf8b5e5c6c7701d536126eef20acb3a213e873ace4f5346d256b8fac
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 0beba165ffd367a7c96de3aa58344d572d01434cd2ef772fbb00342c1f50b01b
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON