Use the complete list of distinct integer pairs=[[11, -1], [12, 0], [13, 1], [14, 5]] and their aligned exact masses=[1/8, 1/4, 1/8, 1/2] on one common finite probability space. Qualification requires every mass to be nonnegative and their exact sum to be 1; zero masses are allowed. Preserve pair-mass alignment. Marginals alone do not specify this joint law or imply independence. No continuous or infinite-support conclusion is claimed. Use exact reduced rational outputs with positive denominators; omit /1 for integers. The joint table must qualify first; requested pair=[23, 99]. Give (pair,mass), using zero when the pair is unlisted.
G001 — Use the complete list of distinct integer pairs=[[11, -1], [12, 0], [13, 1], [14, 5]] and their aligned exact masses=[1/8, 1/4, 1/8, 1/2] on one common finite probability space. Qualification requires every mass to be nonnegative and their exact sum to be 1; zero masses are allowed. Preserve pair-mass alignment. Marginals alone do not specify this joint law or imply independence. No continuous or infinite-support conclusion is claimed. Use exact reduced rational outputs with positive denominators; omit /1 for integers. The joint table must qualify first; requested pair=[23, 99]. Give (pair,mass), using zero when the pair is unlisted.
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
Keep the complete joint table's original pair-mass alignment with distinct support pairs.Zero masses are allowed.Check nonnegativity and exact unit total separately;do not substitute marginals or a uniform law.
S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute requested joint pair mass with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute joint law exact total with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
Result
([23, 99], 0)
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.