# Question 12368: Record Original Pairs Whose Reverse Is Missing

[Return to catalogue page 62](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/questions/page/62/)

[← Question derivation index](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/questions/) · [Original question batch](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/practice/batch-20261013-advance-20261026-r07-equivalence-relation-foundations/#q-20261013-advance-20261026-r07-equivalence-relation-0043)

This teaching derivation has second-context AI mathematical and bilingual semantic review, limited to the model and assumptions stated in this question. It has no human review or new Lean proof and does not promote the original question or MKO to Canonical truth.

R0023-12368 · q-20261013-advance-20261026-r07-equivalence-relation-0043



## Original question and givens

Use the full fixed carrier Fin(6)={0,…,5} and complete distinct ordered relation pairs=[[0, 0], [1, 1], [2, 2], [3, 3], [4, 4], [5, 5], [0, 2], [0, 5], [5, 0]]. Check reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity separately on the whole carrier. Equivalence classes may be emitted only after all three qualifications pass; one counterexample refutes its corresponding axiom. Give (n,lexicographically ordered original [a,b] pairs for which [b,a] is missing,symmetric?). The records are the original pairs, not their absent reverses.


- G001 — Use the full fixed carrier Fin(6)={0,…,5} and complete distinct ordered relation pairs=[[0, 0], [1, 1], [2, 2], [3, 3], [4, 4], [5, 5], [0, 2], [0, 5], [5, 0]]. Check reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity separately on the whole carrier. Equivalence classes may be emitted only after all three qualifications pass; one counterexample refutes its corresponding axiom. Give (n,lexicographically ordered original [a,b] pairs for which [b,a] is missing,symmetric?). The records are the original pairs, not their absent reverses.





## Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.


- [mko-equivalence-relation](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/mko/mko-equivalence-relation/)





## Step-by-step derivation

S001 · impliesBefore

raw relation pairs=[[0, 0], [1, 1], [2, 2], [3, 3], [4, 4], [5, 5], [0, 2], [0, 5], [5, 0]];carrier Fin(6)

After

lexicographically sorted distinct ordered pairs=[[0, 0], [0, 2], [0, 5], [1, 1], [2, 2], [3, 3], [4, 4], [5, 0], [5, 5]]

Conditions: none

List distinct directed pairs lexicographically.Duplicates are invalid;do not silently add reverses,diagonals or a transitive closure.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: complete_relation_no_duplicate_or_implicit_repair · Uses: G001





S002 · impliesBefore

original pair=[0, 0];required reverse=[0, 0]

After

reverse present=Yes

Conditions: none

Check for the reverse,but record the original[a,b] on failure,not its missing[b,a] reverse.An empty relation is vacuously symmetric.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: relation_original_pair_missing_reverse_record · Uses: G001, S001





S003 · impliesBefore

original pair=[0, 2];required reverse=[2, 0]

After

reverse present=No

Conditions: none

Check for the reverse,but record the original[a,b] on failure,not its missing[b,a] reverse.An empty relation is vacuously symmetric.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: relation_original_pair_missing_reverse_record · Uses: G001, S002





S004 · impliesBefore

original pair=[0, 5];required reverse=[5, 0]

After

reverse present=Yes

Conditions: none

Check for the reverse,but record the original[a,b] on failure,not its missing[b,a] reverse.An empty relation is vacuously symmetric.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: relation_original_pair_missing_reverse_record · Uses: G001, S003





S005 · impliesBefore

original pair=[1, 1];required reverse=[1, 1]

After

reverse present=Yes

Conditions: none

Check for the reverse,but record the original[a,b] on failure,not its missing[b,a] reverse.An empty relation is vacuously symmetric.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: relation_original_pair_missing_reverse_record · Uses: G001, S004





S006 · impliesBefore

original pair=[2, 2];required reverse=[2, 2]

After

reverse present=Yes

Conditions: none

Check for the reverse,but record the original[a,b] on failure,not its missing[b,a] reverse.An empty relation is vacuously symmetric.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: relation_original_pair_missing_reverse_record · Uses: G001, S005





S007 · impliesBefore

original pair=[3, 3];required reverse=[3, 3]

After

reverse present=Yes

Conditions: none

Check for the reverse,but record the original[a,b] on failure,not its missing[b,a] reverse.An empty relation is vacuously symmetric.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: relation_original_pair_missing_reverse_record · Uses: G001, S006





S008 · impliesBefore

original pair=[4, 4];required reverse=[4, 4]

After

reverse present=Yes

Conditions: none

Check for the reverse,but record the original[a,b] on failure,not its missing[b,a] reverse.An empty relation is vacuously symmetric.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: relation_original_pair_missing_reverse_record · Uses: G001, S007





S009 · impliesBefore

original pair=[5, 0];required reverse=[0, 5]

After

reverse present=Yes

Conditions: none

Check for the reverse,but record the original[a,b] on failure,not its missing[b,a] reverse.An empty relation is vacuously symmetric.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: relation_original_pair_missing_reverse_record · Uses: G001, S008





S010 · impliesBefore

original pair=[5, 5];required reverse=[5, 5]

After

reverse present=Yes

Conditions: none

Check for the reverse,but record the original[a,b] on failure,not its missing[b,a] reverse.An empty relation is vacuously symmetric.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: relation_original_pair_missing_reverse_record · Uses: G001, S009









## Reverse checks


- S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
- S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
- S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
- S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
- S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
- S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
- S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
- S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
- S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
- S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.





## Result

(6, [[0, 2]], No)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.





## This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
- input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
- original question SHA-256: 09739f22e2546682e52723af7a6aa7d6f1a407a839f63116f2c298fb51b925a9
- candidate record SHA-256: e485bc7987cd252477fe512252051ef4c6ec2dc1dbeeb14477410621d0277f68
- semantic review receipt SHA-256: f783e81f44ff0faa13dbf948657e9187244a59a809ebdf96f22cca24966649ff
- question-first witness SHA-256: 49a50ed0550be55124d6562260c2ccf4fa6d3f316d7ad9d0d32174400e362e18
- Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED

[Same-source full JSON](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/data/question-derivations/questions/q-20261013-advance-20261026-r07-equivalence-relation-0043.json)




