Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 12393: Record Every Failed Composable-Pair Triple

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 62

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0023-12393 · q-20261013-advance-20261026-r07-equivalence-relation-0068

Original question and givens

Use the full fixed carrier Fin(6)={0,…,5} and complete distinct ordered relation pairs=[[0, 0], [1, 1], [2, 2], [3, 3], [4, 4], [5, 5], [0, 2], [0, 5], [5, 0]]. Check reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity separately on the whole carrier. Equivalence classes may be emitted only after all three qualifications pass; one counterexample refutes its corresponding axiom. Give (n,all [a,b,c] witnesses with aRb and bRc but not aRc,transitive?). Preserve the nested lexicographic order of the two supplied relation pairs. Despite the source field name missing_transitive_pairs, the records are triples.

  • G001 — Use the full fixed carrier Fin(6)={0,…,5} and complete distinct ordered relation pairs=[[0, 0], [1, 1], [2, 2], [3, 3], [4, 4], [5, 5], [0, 2], [0, 5], [5, 0]]. Check reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity separately on the whole carrier. Equivalence classes may be emitted only after all three qualifications pass; one counterexample refutes its corresponding axiom. Give (n,all [a,b,c] witnesses with aRb and bRc but not aRc,transitive?). Preserve the nested lexicographic order of the two supplied relation pairs. Despite the source field name missing_transitive_pairs, the records are triples.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

raw relation pairs=[[0, 0], [1, 1], [2, 2], [3, 3], [4, 4], [5, 5], [0, 2], [0, 5], [5, 0]];carrier Fin(6)

After

lexicographically sorted distinct ordered pairs=[[0, 0], [0, 2], [0, 5], [1, 1], [2, 2], [3, 3], [4, 4], [5, 0], [5, 5]]

Conditions: none

List distinct directed pairs lexicographically.Duplicates are invalid;do not silently add reverses,diagonals or a transitive closure.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: complete_relation_no_duplicate_or_implicit_repair · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

first original pair=[0, 0];all composable second endpoints=[0, 2, 5]

After

required transitivity rows [a,b,d,aRd]=[[0, 0, 0, Yes], [0, 0, 2, Yes], [0, 0, 5, Yes]]

Conditions: none

List every supplied bRd continuation and check aRd.A failure is the triple[a,b,d].No continuations make this premise branch vacuous,not the whole relation an equivalence.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: relation_every_composable_original_pair · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

first original pair=[0, 2];all composable second endpoints=[2]

After

required transitivity rows [a,b,d,aRd]=[[0, 2, 2, Yes]]

Conditions: none

List every supplied bRd continuation and check aRd.A failure is the triple[a,b,d].No continuations make this premise branch vacuous,not the whole relation an equivalence.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: relation_every_composable_original_pair · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

first original pair=[0, 5];all composable second endpoints=[0, 5]

After

required transitivity rows [a,b,d,aRd]=[[0, 5, 0, Yes], [0, 5, 5, Yes]]

Conditions: none

List every supplied bRd continuation and check aRd.A failure is the triple[a,b,d].No continuations make this premise branch vacuous,not the whole relation an equivalence.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: relation_every_composable_original_pair · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

first original pair=[1, 1];all composable second endpoints=[1]

After

required transitivity rows [a,b,d,aRd]=[[1, 1, 1, Yes]]

Conditions: none

List every supplied bRd continuation and check aRd.A failure is the triple[a,b,d].No continuations make this premise branch vacuous,not the whole relation an equivalence.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: relation_every_composable_original_pair · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

first original pair=[2, 2];all composable second endpoints=[2]

After

required transitivity rows [a,b,d,aRd]=[[2, 2, 2, Yes]]

Conditions: none

List every supplied bRd continuation and check aRd.A failure is the triple[a,b,d].No continuations make this premise branch vacuous,not the whole relation an equivalence.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: relation_every_composable_original_pair · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · implies

Before

first original pair=[3, 3];all composable second endpoints=[3]

After

required transitivity rows [a,b,d,aRd]=[[3, 3, 3, Yes]]

Conditions: none

List every supplied bRd continuation and check aRd.A failure is the triple[a,b,d].No continuations make this premise branch vacuous,not the whole relation an equivalence.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: relation_every_composable_original_pair · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · implies

Before

first original pair=[4, 4];all composable second endpoints=[4]

After

required transitivity rows [a,b,d,aRd]=[[4, 4, 4, Yes]]

Conditions: none

List every supplied bRd continuation and check aRd.A failure is the triple[a,b,d].No continuations make this premise branch vacuous,not the whole relation an equivalence.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: relation_every_composable_original_pair · Uses: G001, S007

S009 · implies

Before

first original pair=[5, 0];all composable second endpoints=[0, 2, 5]

After

required transitivity rows [a,b,d,aRd]=[[5, 0, 0, Yes], [5, 0, 2, No], [5, 0, 5, Yes]]

Conditions: none

List every supplied bRd continuation and check aRd.A failure is the triple[a,b,d].No continuations make this premise branch vacuous,not the whole relation an equivalence.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: relation_every_composable_original_pair · Uses: G001, S008

S010 · implies

Before

first original pair=[5, 5];all composable second endpoints=[0, 5]

After

required transitivity rows [a,b,d,aRd]=[[5, 5, 0, Yes], [5, 5, 5, Yes]]

Conditions: none

List every supplied bRd continuation and check aRd.A failure is the triple[a,b,d].No continuations make this premise branch vacuous,not the whole relation an equivalence.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: relation_every_composable_original_pair · Uses: G001, S009

Reverse checks

  • S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(6, [[5, 0, 2]], No)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 0cdd7e1617c2616773620ea2c2a3f2087625317a03d71b48b45708aa0438dff4
  • candidate record SHA-256: cd1687d1ff93f6f9d2f0cc4c9a21c89747e59b1aac90283f25b371574f78db4e
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: f783e81f44ff0faa13dbf948657e9187244a59a809ebdf96f22cca24966649ff
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 49a50ed0550be55124d6562260c2ccf4fa6d3f316d7ad9d0d32174400e362e18
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON