Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 12732: Evaluate an Ordered Real Bilinear Matrix Formula

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 64

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0024-12732 · q-20261014-advance-20261027-r04-real-bilinear-form-0007

Original question and givens

Use B(x,y)=x^T A y over the real coordinate space with square integer matrix A=[[-6, 3], [3, 2]]. All input vector dimensions must match the matrix. Distributivity proves linearity separately in both slots for all real vectors and scalars; individual integer evaluations illustrate that fixed formula, not a black-box sampling proof. Symmetry, positive definiteness, nondegeneracy and inner-product qualification are additional conditions. x=[-1, 3], y=[1, 6]. Give (matrix,x,y,value).

  • G001 — Use B(x,y)=x^T A y over the real coordinate space with square integer matrix A=[[-6, 3], [3, 2]]. All input vector dimensions must match the matrix. Distributivity proves linearity separately in both slots for all real vectors and scalars; individual integer evaluations illustrate that fixed formula, not a black-box sampling proof. Symmetry, positive definiteness, nondegeneracy and inner-product qualification are additional conditions. x=[-1, 3], y=[1, 6]. Give (matrix,x,y,value).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

fixed real matrix=[[-6, 3], [3, 2]];B(x,y)=sum_i sum_j x_i*A_ij*y_j

After

distributivity proves real linearity in each slot separately for all vectors and scalars

Conditions: none

Distributivity expands any real linear combination in either slot of the finite double sum,giving separate universal linearity certificates.Integer instances evaluate this fixed formula,not prove a black box by sampling.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: matrix_formula_bilinearity_universal_not_samples · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

requested form:matrix=[[-6, 3], [3, 2]];first slot=[-1, 3];second slot=[1, 6]

After

B(first,second)=first^T*(matrix*second);slot order fixed

Conditions: none

First multiply A by the second slot,then dot with the first.A general matrix is not symmetric,so the two slots cannot be exchanged.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: bilinear_ordered_matrix_slots · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

requested form matrix row0 column0 term := mul(-6, 1)

After

requested form matrix row0 column0 term = -6

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from the original roles and complete established operands,without changing pairings,order or replacing guards by approximation.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

requested form matrix row0 column1 term := mul(3, 6)

After

requested form matrix row0 column1 term = 18

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from the original roles and complete established operands,without changing pairings,order or replacing guards by approximation.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

requested form matrix-times-second row0 := sum(-6, 18)

After

requested form matrix-times-second row0 = 12

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from the original roles and complete established operands,without changing pairings,order or replacing guards by approximation.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · calculation

Before

requested form matrix row1 column0 term := mul(3, 1)

After

requested form matrix row1 column0 term = 3

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from the original roles and complete established operands,without changing pairings,order or replacing guards by approximation.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · calculation

Before

requested form matrix row1 column1 term := mul(2, 6)

After

requested form matrix row1 column1 term = 12

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from the original roles and complete established operands,without changing pairings,order or replacing guards by approximation.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · calculation

Before

requested form matrix-times-second row1 := sum(3, 12)

After

requested form matrix-times-second row1 = 15

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from the original roles and complete established operands,without changing pairings,order or replacing guards by approximation.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S007

S009 · calculation

Before

requested form first-slot coordinate0 term := mul(-1, 12)

After

requested form first-slot coordinate0 term = -12

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from the original roles and complete established operands,without changing pairings,order or replacing guards by approximation.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S008

S010 · calculation

Before

requested form first-slot coordinate1 term := mul(3, 15)

After

requested form first-slot coordinate1 term = 45

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from the original roles and complete established operands,without changing pairings,order or replacing guards by approximation.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S009

S011 · calculation

Before

requested form final first-slot dot sum := sum(-12, 45)

After

requested form final first-slot dot sum = 33

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from the original roles and complete established operands,without changing pairings,order or replacing guards by approximation.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S010

Reverse checks

  • S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute requested form final first-slot dot sum with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute requested form first-slot coordinate1 term with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute requested form first-slot coordinate0 term with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute requested form matrix-times-second row1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute requested form matrix row1 column1 term with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute requested form matrix row1 column0 term with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute requested form matrix-times-second row0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute requested form matrix row0 column1 term with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute requested form matrix row0 column0 term with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([[-6, 3], [3, 2]], [-1, 3], [1, 6], 33)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 4e697e914a72dc1b7b17140ccd1632386061e1528a1fe484e89359e01eef16e1
  • candidate record SHA-256: 220aca999ab735c8ee4dc9b803406e9f09094956a37efadfe342e4c862a28c29
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 1c8f6c2c6c75852cb93c08235684ce9f32ebe86065c58c693a04257e772c2d35
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 05fd764b5f9f7fff6185003efe576d87632f6daf40606ac3839a7feafe4f80d8
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON