Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 13722: Check the Additive Structure before Multiplicative Absorption

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 69

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0026-13722 · q-20261014-advance-20261028-r02-finite-two-sided-ideal-0047

Original question and givens

Use the same qualified complete finite unital ring on Fin(8)={0,…,7}, with addition=[[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], [1, 2, 3, 7, 0, 6, 4, 5], [2, 3, 7, 5, 1, 4, 0, 6], [3, 7, 5, 6, 2, 0, 1, 4], [4, 0, 1, 2, 6, 7, 5, 3], [5, 6, 4, 0, 7, 2, 3, 1], [6, 4, 0, 1, 5, 3, 7, 2], [7, 5, 6, 4, 3, 1, 2, 0]] and multiplication=[[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], [0, 2, 7, 6, 6, 2, 7, 0], [0, 3, 6, 1, 5, 4, 2, 7], [0, 4, 6, 5, 1, 3, 2, 7], [0, 5, 2, 4, 3, 1, 6, 7], [0, 6, 7, 2, 2, 6, 7, 0], [0, 7, 0, 7, 7, 7, 0, 0]] in label order. All unital-ring axioms, including distinct two-sided identities, must already hold. The identity labels need not be 0 and 1. Commutativity is a separate multiplication obligation; even a commutative ring may have nonzero zero divisors and need not be a field. Normalize subset=[0, 7] as distinct carrier labels in increasing order. Its operations and inverse map come from this same parent ring. Additive-subgroup qualification, left absorption and right absorption are independent obligations. No quotient, maximality or primality is constructed. Give (subset,zero,all missing [a,b,a+b] rows,all missing [a,additive_inverse] rows,additive_subgroup?).

  • G001 — Use the same qualified complete finite unital ring on Fin(8)={0,…,7}, with addition=[[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], [1, 2, 3, 7, 0, 6, 4, 5], [2, 3, 7, 5, 1, 4, 0, 6], [3, 7, 5, 6, 2, 0, 1, 4], [4, 0, 1, 2, 6, 7, 5, 3], [5, 6, 4, 0, 7, 2, 3, 1], [6, 4, 0, 1, 5, 3, 7, 2], [7, 5, 6, 4, 3, 1, 2, 0]] and multiplication=[[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], [0, 2, 7, 6, 6, 2, 7, 0], [0, 3, 6, 1, 5, 4, 2, 7], [0, 4, 6, 5, 1, 3, 2, 7], [0, 5, 2, 4, 3, 1, 6, 7], [0, 6, 7, 2, 2, 6, 7, 0], [0, 7, 0, 7, 7, 7, 0, 0]] in label order. All unital-ring axioms, including distinct two-sided identities, must already hold. The identity labels need not be 0 and 1. Commutativity is a separate multiplication obligation; even a commutative ring may have nonzero zero divisors and need not be a field. Normalize subset=[0, 7] as distinct carrier labels in increasing order. Its operations and inverse map come from this same parent ring. Additive-subgroup qualification, left absorption and right absorption are independent obligations. No quotient, maximality or primality is constructed. Give (subset,zero,all missing [a,b,a+b] rows,all missing [a,additive_inverse] rows,additive_subgroup?).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

same parent carrier Fin(8);addition=[[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], [1, 2, 3, 7, 0, 6, 4, 5], [2, 3, 7, 5, 1, 4, 0, 6], [3, 7, 5, 6, 2, 0, 1, 4], [4, 0, 1, 2, 6, 7, 5, 3], [5, 6, 4, 0, 7, 2, 3, 1], [6, 4, 0, 1, 5, 3, 7, 2], [7, 5, 6, 4, 3, 1, 2, 0]];multiplication=[[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], [0, 2, 7, 6, 6, 2, 7, 0], [0, 3, 6, 1, 5, 4, 2, 7], [0, 4, 6, 5, 1, 3, 2, 7], [0, 5, 2, 4, 3, 1, 6, 7], [0, 6, 7, 2, 2, 6, 7, 0], [0, 7, 0, 7, 7, 7, 0, 0]]

After

both complete operation tables typed and closed

Conditions: none

Bind subsequent ideals or commutativity to this same parent ring.Preserve the complete original tables;carrier labels are not integer arithmetic values.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: parent_ring_original_complete_tables · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

every additive triple checked;first associativity failure=null;all additive pairs commute=Yes

After

additive zero candidates=[0];actual zero=0;two-sided additive inverses in label order=[0, 4, 6, 5, 1, 3, 2, 7]

Conditions: none

Audit additive associativity,commutativity,the two-sided zero and each inverse over the complete carrier.This qualified parent is the problem's premise,checked by complete finite conditions rather than samples.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: parent_additive_abelian_group_complete_audit · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

every multiplicative triple checked;first associativity failure=null

After

multiplicative identity candidates=[1];actual one=1

Conditions: none

Multiplication here requires associativity and a two-sided one,not commutativity or inverses of every nonzero element.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: parent_multiplicative_monoid_complete_audit · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

all 512 left and 512 right distributivity triples checked

After

first left failure=null;first right failure=null;zero=0;one=1;distinct=Yes

Conditions: none

Audit both distributive obligations completely and separately.Zero and one must be distinct actual elements.Unital alone implies neither a commutative ring,domain nor field.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: parent_both_distributivities_and_distinct_identities · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

raw subset=[0, 7];same qualified parent zero=0

After

sorted distinct parent labels=[0, 7]

Conditions: none

Normalize the subset as a sorted set,but obtain all operations and inverses from the same parent ring.Do not substitute new operations or integer arithmetic on labels.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: ideal_subset_same_parent_normalization · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

subset element=0;parent additive inverse=0

After

inverse belongs to subset=Yes

Conditions: none

An additive subgroup needs each member's parent-ring additive inverse to remain in the subset,not a multiplicative inverse.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: ideal_each_parent_additive_inverse · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · implies

Before

subset ordered pair=[0, 0];parent sum=0

After

sum belongs to subset=Yes

Conditions: none

Check every ordered addition pair;sampling does not replace closure.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: ideal_all_additive_closure_pairs · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · implies

Before

subset ordered pair=[0, 7];parent sum=7

After

sum belongs to subset=Yes

Conditions: none

Check every ordered addition pair;sampling does not replace closure.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: ideal_all_additive_closure_pairs · Uses: G001, S007

S009 · implies

Before

subset element=7;parent additive inverse=7

After

inverse belongs to subset=Yes

Conditions: none

An additive subgroup needs each member's parent-ring additive inverse to remain in the subset,not a multiplicative inverse.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: ideal_each_parent_additive_inverse · Uses: G001, S008

S010 · implies

Before

subset ordered pair=[7, 0];parent sum=7

After

sum belongs to subset=Yes

Conditions: none

Check every ordered addition pair;sampling does not replace closure.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: ideal_all_additive_closure_pairs · Uses: G001, S009

S011 · implies

Before

subset ordered pair=[7, 7];parent sum=0

After

sum belongs to subset=Yes

Conditions: none

Check every ordered addition pair;sampling does not replace closure.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: ideal_all_additive_closure_pairs · Uses: G001, S010

S012 · implies

Before

subset nonempty=Yes;actual zero belongs=Yes;missing sums=[];missing inverses=[]

After

additive subgroup=Yes

Conditions: none

Nonemptiness,the actual zero,addition closure and inverse closure must all hold.An empty subset does not become an additive subgroup through vacuous closure checks.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: ideal_additive_subgroup_nonempty_zero_and_closure · Uses: G001, S011

Reverse checks

  • S012 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([0, 7], 0, [], [], Yes)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 06b5e64e12a31a8e967651026ba1ff7396df141533d40d1bfa4e0681efc38856
  • candidate record SHA-256: 4c5abd53e4ef222e4acfca634e9c2993427637c73fd514ebcab54449a33d646b
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: f335caca08574c9f949c141083c66655fee51c227d45d80a3ddb7d78f862d798
  • question-first witness SHA-256: cc7ba54738af91a6871fc1c20e45ad8f2b434392273fa334bd16a3b2238f4a77
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON