Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 13824: Evaluate a Candidate Bilinear Form without Presuming an Inner Product

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 70

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0026-13824 · q-20261014-advance-20261028-r04-real-inner-product-space-0024

Original question and givens

Use the exact real R² candidate B(x,y)=x^T A y with the complete integer matrix A=[[25, 2], [2, 5]]. Bilinearity follows from the formula; symmetry and strict positive definiteness remain separate obligations. For a symmetric 2-by-2 matrix the Sylvester certificate requires a positive leading entry and positive determinant. Positive semidefiniteness or finitely many positive samples are insufficient, and completeness is not inferred. x=[1, -1], y=[-4, -11]. Give (matrix,x,y,value). This evaluation family does not first require the symmetry and positive-definite checks to pass.

  • G001 — Use the exact real R² candidate B(x,y)=x^T A y with the complete integer matrix A=[[25, 2], [2, 5]]. Bilinearity follows from the formula; symmetry and strict positive definiteness remain separate obligations. For a symmetric 2-by-2 matrix the Sylvester certificate requires a positive leading entry and positive determinant. Positive semidefiniteness or finitely many positive samples are insufficient, and completeness is not inferred. x=[1, -1], y=[-4, -11]. Give (matrix,x,y,value). This evaluation family does not first require the symmetry and positive-definite checks to pass.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

candidate real R2 form;matrix=[[25, 2], [2, 5]];B(x,y)=x^T*A*y

After

matrix distributivity supplies bilinearity;other inner-product obligations remain separate

Conditions: none

The matrix formula is bilinear without presuming symmetry or positive definiteness.This protocol is real R²,not a complex-conjugate or arbitrary-dimensional claim.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: inner_candidate_bilinear_not_presumed_inner_product · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

candidate evaluation matrix second slot:matrix=[[25, 2], [2, 5]];input=[-4, -11]

After

input dimension=2;output dimension=2;rows dot input

Conditions: none

Retain column-input/row-output roles for rectangular matrices.Computed values can exceed raw input bounds and are not clipped.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: matrix_row_column_roles · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

candidate evaluation matrix second slot row0 column0 product := mul(25, -4)

After

candidate evaluation matrix second slot row0 column0 product = -100

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining coordinates,coefficients,signs and necessary guards.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

candidate evaluation matrix second slot row0 column1 product := mul(2, -11)

After

candidate evaluation matrix second slot row0 column1 product = -22

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining coordinates,coefficients,signs and necessary guards.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

candidate evaluation matrix second slot row0 sum := sum(-100, -22)

After

candidate evaluation matrix second slot row0 sum = -122

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining coordinates,coefficients,signs and necessary guards.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · calculation

Before

candidate evaluation matrix second slot row1 column0 product := mul(2, -4)

After

candidate evaluation matrix second slot row1 column0 product = -8

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining coordinates,coefficients,signs and necessary guards.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · calculation

Before

candidate evaluation matrix second slot row1 column1 product := mul(5, -11)

After

candidate evaluation matrix second slot row1 column1 product = -55

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining coordinates,coefficients,signs and necessary guards.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · calculation

Before

candidate evaluation matrix second slot row1 sum := sum(-8, -55)

After

candidate evaluation matrix second slot row1 sum = -63

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining coordinates,coefficients,signs and necessary guards.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S007

S009 · calculation

Before

candidate evaluation first coordinate0 product := mul(1, -122)

After

candidate evaluation first coordinate0 product = -122

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining coordinates,coefficients,signs and necessary guards.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S008

S010 · calculation

Before

candidate evaluation first coordinate1 product := mul(-1, -63)

After

candidate evaluation first coordinate1 product = 63

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining coordinates,coefficients,signs and necessary guards.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S009

S011 · calculation

Before

candidate evaluation bilinear sum := sum(-122, 63)

After

candidate evaluation bilinear sum = -59

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining coordinates,coefficients,signs and necessary guards.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S010

Reverse checks

  • S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute candidate evaluation bilinear sum with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute candidate evaluation first coordinate1 product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute candidate evaluation first coordinate0 product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute candidate evaluation matrix second slot row1 sum with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute candidate evaluation matrix second slot row1 column1 product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute candidate evaluation matrix second slot row1 column0 product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute candidate evaluation matrix second slot row0 sum with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute candidate evaluation matrix second slot row0 column1 product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute candidate evaluation matrix second slot row0 column0 product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([[25, 2], [2, 5]], [1, -1], [-4, -11], -59)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 08a5ad350ef46a0150e3590bc9fd0a545cba252e80c498a3a90575620fb7f1fb
  • candidate record SHA-256: 9992b3dffce17503133511e7b190711af7b2181012cfeaca96b82ae9fd811b3a
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: f335caca08574c9f949c141083c66655fee51c227d45d80a3ddb7d78f862d798
  • question-first witness SHA-256: cc7ba54738af91a6871fc1c20e45ad8f2b434392273fa334bd16a3b2238f4a77
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON