Explore related knowledge and questions →
← Question derivation index · Original question batch
R0026-13866 · q-20261014-advance-20261028-r04-real-inner-product-space-0091
Use the exact real R² candidate B(x,y)=x^T A y with the complete integer matrix A=[[17, 2], [3, 5]]. Bilinearity follows from the formula; symmetry and strict positive definiteness remain separate obligations. For a symmetric 2-by-2 matrix the Sylvester certificate requires a positive leading entry and positive determinant. Positive semidefiniteness or finitely many positive samples are insufficient, and completeness is not inferred. Give (matrix,bilinear?,symmetric?,positive_definite?,inner_product?,classification). Classification is real_inner_product or not_inner_product.
G001 — Use the exact real R² candidate B(x,y)=x^T A y with the complete integer matrix A=[[17, 2], [3, 5]]. Bilinearity follows from the formula; symmetry and strict positive definiteness remain separate obligations. For a symmetric 2-by-2 matrix the Sylvester certificate requires a positive leading entry and positive determinant. Positive semidefiniteness or finitely many positive samples are insufficient, and completeness is not inferred. Give (matrix,bilinear?,symmetric?,positive_definite?,inner_product?,classification). Classification is real_inner_product or not_inner_product.Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
Before
candidate real R2 form;matrix=[[17, 2], [3, 5]];B(x,y)=x^T*A*y
After
matrix distributivity supplies bilinearity;other inner-product obligations remain separate
Conditions: none
The matrix formula is bilinear without presuming symmetry or positive definiteness.This protocol is real R²,not a complex-conjugate or arbitrary-dimensional claim.
Rule: inner_candidate_bilinear_not_presumed_inner_product · Uses: G001
Before
opposite off-diagonal entries=[2, 3]
After
symmetric=No
Conditions: none
Standard basis vectors read off matrix entries,so symmetry is equivalent to equality of the two off-diagonal entries.One pairwise equality cannot establish universal symmetry.
Rule: inner_symmetry_additional_to_bilinearity · Uses: G001, S001
Before
inner determinant diagonal product := mul(17, 5)
After
inner determinant diagonal product = 85
Conditions: none
Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining coordinates,coefficients,signs and necessary guards.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002
Before
inner determinant off-diagonal product := mul(2, 3)
After
inner determinant off-diagonal product = 6
Conditions: none
Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining coordinates,coefficients,signs and necessary guards.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003
Before
inner signed determinant := sub(85, 6)
After
inner signed determinant = 79
Conditions: none
Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining coordinates,coefficients,signs and necessary guards.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004
Before
matrix=[[17, 2], [3, 5]];leading=17;determinant=79
After
symmetric positive-definite inner-product certificate rejected at symmetry premise
Conditions: none
Nonsymmetry already rejects an inner-product candidate.This No does not separately classify positivity of x^T A x after discarding the antisymmetric part.
Rule: nonsymmetric_inner_certificate_not_quadratic_classification · Uses: G001, S005
Before
symmetric=No;leading=17;determinant=79
After
strict symmetric R2 certificate=No
Conditions: none
Conjoin symmetry,positive leading minor and positive determinant.This is the stated symmetric R² inner-product protocol,with no additional completeness claim.
Rule: strict_Sylvester_conditions_conjunction · Uses: G001, S006
S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute inner signed determinant with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute inner determinant off-diagonal product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute inner determinant diagonal product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.([[17, 2], [3, 5]], Yes, No, No, No, not_inner_product)
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.
input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50dboriginal question SHA-256: d295281a52956da35fcd9fe0c78c9aef9c7a917394f02358312afe0a5d452978candidate record SHA-256: 32c0dbbb46a78310b483779020903502db6c5f3da70cd7c90629114c38de68f4semantic review receipt SHA-256: f335caca08574c9f949c141083c66655fee51c227d45d80a3ddb7d78f862d798question-first witness SHA-256: cc7ba54738af91a6871fc1c20e45ad8f2b434392273fa334bd16a3b2238f4a77Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED