# Question 14735: Unbounded Exponents, Not Infinitely Many Coefficients in One Polynomial

[Return to catalogue page 74](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/questions/page/74/)

[← Question derivation index](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/questions/) · [Original question batch](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/practice/batch-20261014-advance-20261029-r02-polynomial-ring-over-finite-commutative-ring-foundations/#q-20261014-advance-20261029-r02-polynomial-ring-over-finite-commutative-ring-0085)

This teaching derivation has second-context AI mathematical and bilingual semantic review, limited to the model and assumptions stated in this question. It has no human review or new Lean proof and does not promote the original question or MKO to Canonical truth.

R0028-14735 · q-20261014-advance-20261029-r02-polynomial-ring-over-finite-commutative-ring-0085



## Original question and givens

Use the same qualified complete finite commutative unital ring on Fin(4)={0,…,3}, with addition=[[3, 0, 1, 2], [0, 1, 2, 3], [1, 2, 3, 0], [2, 3, 0, 1]] and multiplication=[[2, 1, 0, 3], [1, 1, 1, 1], [0, 1, 2, 3], [3, 1, 3, 1]] in carrier-label order. All ring axioms and distinct two-sided identities already hold; the zero and one labels need not be 0 and 1. No nonzero-zero-divisor or field premise is silently added. Polynomial coefficients are in increasing exponent order and have finite support. Remove trailing copies of the actual ring zero, representing the zero polynomial by [zero]. The output field degree is the last index of that normalized array, hence 0 for [zero] in this protocol; it is not a claim about the usual degree convention for the zero polynomial. A finite coefficient ring does not make ordinary R[x] finite, and zero divisors forbid an unconditional degree-of-product equality. Nonnegative exponent=10. Give (degree,monomial,coefficient_count,distinct?,R[x]_carrier_infinite_when_zero_ne_one).


- G001 — Use the same qualified complete finite commutative unital ring on Fin(4)={0,…,3}, with addition=[[3, 0, 1, 2], [0, 1, 2, 3], [1, 2, 3, 0], [2, 3, 0, 1]] and multiplication=[[2, 1, 0, 3], [1, 1, 1, 1], [0, 1, 2, 3], [3, 1, 3, 1]] in carrier-label order. All ring axioms and distinct two-sided identities already hold; the zero and one labels need not be 0 and 1. No nonzero-zero-divisor or field premise is silently added. Polynomial coefficients are in increasing exponent order and have finite support. Remove trailing copies of the actual ring zero, representing the zero polynomial by [zero]. The output field degree is the last index of that normalized array, hence 0 for [zero] in this protocol; it is not a claim about the usual degree convention for the zero polynomial. A finite coefficient ring does not make ordinary R[x] finite, and zero divisors forbid an unconditional degree-of-product equality. Nonnegative exponent=10. Give (degree,monomial,coefficient_count,distinct?,R[x]_carrier_infinite_when_zero_ne_one).





## Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.


- [mko-polynomial-ring-over-finite-commutative-ring](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/en/mko/mko-polynomial-ring-over-finite-commutative-ring/)





## Step-by-step derivation

S001 · impliesBefore

same carrier Fin(4);addition=[[3, 0, 1, 2], [0, 1, 2, 3], [1, 2, 3, 0], [2, 3, 0, 1]];multiplication=[[2, 1, 0, 3], [1, 1, 1, 1], [0, 1, 2, 3], [3, 1, 3, 1]]

After

actual additive zero=1;actual multiplicative one=2;additive inverses=[2, 1, 0, 3]

Conditions: none

Bind coefficients and domain reasoning to the same complete parent tables.Identities are actual elements,not presumed labels0 or1.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: commutative_parent_actual_tables_and_identities · Uses: G001





S002 · impliesBefore

all additive/multiplicative pairs and triples checked;first failures=[null, null, null, null]

After

additive commute=Yes;multiplicative commute=Yes;zero differs from one=Yes

Conditions: none

Qualify the whole additive abelian group,multiplicative associativity/commutativity,both distributive laws and distinct identities.Domain and polynomial obligations follow this premise,not sampled successes.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: complete_commutative_unital_parent_qualification · Uses: G001, S001





S003 · calculationBefore

monomial coefficient count := sum(10, 1)

After

monomial coefficient count = 11

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining denominators,signs,indices and necessary guards.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002





S004 · impliesBefore

arbitrary nonnegative exponent;displayed degree=10;actual zero=1;one=2

After

monomial coefficients=[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2];coefficient count=11

Conditions: none

This polynomial has finite support,with one at the selected exponent and the same parent zero elsewhere.It is not one infinitely long polynomial.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: polynomial_each_monomial_finite_support · Uses: G001, S003





S005 · impliesBefore

zero=1 differs from one=2;compare any two different exponents d<e

After

coefficient at e distinguishes x^e from x^d;ordinary R[x] carrier infinite

Conditions: none

For arbitrary d<e,the coefficient at e is one in one monomial and zero in the other,so monomials at distinct exponents differ.A finite coefficient ring does not make ordinary R[x] finite,nor does one displayed witness enumerate it.

Step identifiers and dependenciesRule: polynomial_unbounded_exponents_not_finite_coefficient_carrier · Uses: G001, S004









## Reverse checks


- S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
- S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
- S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute monomial coefficient count with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
- S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
- S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.





## Result

(10, [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2], 11, Yes, R[x]_carrier_infinite_when_zero_ne_one)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.





## This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
- input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
- original question SHA-256: 8596ce5d9e7d4f83bc792b9be7eaa7b5b5f377a1109b71121ee077f6a09a5a2b
- candidate record SHA-256: 2ded41c069b9f3d266bd65a09e918555e9336ff18f75f4eec2365b858a0cc5ec
- semantic review receipt SHA-256: bfea39236e49aa7e44aa18bfa0d7857ff34a6acb762d0599e20b0f5af0f209ae
- question-first witness SHA-256: 61c433f5c1e55ed4d84d08557fb8c117d26bbd404fdf05519ad42c09324c36e0
- Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED

[Same-source full JSON](https://ocme.evemisslab.com/data/question-derivations/questions/q-20261014-advance-20261029-r02-polynomial-ring-over-finite-commutative-ring-0085.json)




