Question 14152: Block-Constant Values Give Conditioning Measurability

Original question and givens

Use one complete finite probability space with outcome indices 0 through 3, aligned masses=[30/49, 5/49, 12/49, 2/49], values X=[-11, -2, 3, 11], and conditioning-block labels=[0, 0, 1, 1]. Masses are nonnegative and total exactly 1. Block labels describe a partition of this same space; list block summaries in increasing label order and outcomes in original index order. Conditional expectation is constant on each positive-mass block, with its weighted mean, and preserves every block integral. A zero-mass block is only determined almost surely: return a.s._arbitrary, never divide by zero. Use exact reduced fractions with positive denominators, omitting /1 for integers. Give (conditional_values,block_rows,measurable?). Each block row is [label,indices,distinct_conditional_values,constant?].

• G001 — Use one complete finite probability space with outcome indices 0 through 3, aligned masses=[30/49, 5/49, 12/49, 2/49], values X=[-11, -2, 3, 11], and conditioning-block labels=[0, 0, 1, 1]. Masses are nonnegative and total exactly 1. Block labels describe a partition of this same space; list block summaries in increasing label order and outcomes in original index order. Conditional expectation is constant on each positive-mass block, with its weighted mean, and preserves every block integral. A zero-mass block is only determined almost surely: return a.s._arbitrary, never divide by zero. Use exact reduced fractions with positive denominators, omitting /1 for integers. Give (conditional_values,block_rows,measurable?). Each block row is [label,indices,distinct_conditional_values,constant?].

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

• mko-conditional-expectation

Step-by-step derivation

conditional model whole mass sum := sum(30/49, 5/49, 12/49, 2/49)

conditional model whole mass sum = 1

conditional model:raw aligned masses=[[30, 49], [5, 49], [12, 49], [2, 49]]

normalized masses=[30/49, 5/49, 12/49, 2/49];nonnegative=Yes;total=1

same outcome indices=[0, 1, 2, 3];X values=[-11, -2, 3, 11];block labels=[0, 0, 1, 1]

distinct conditioning labels in increasing order=[0, 1]

block0 mass := sum(30/49, 5/49)

block0 mass = 5/7

block0 atom0 weighted X := mul(30/49, -11)

block0 atom0 weighted X = -330/49

block0 atom1 weighted X := mul(5/49, -2)

block0 atom1 weighted X = -10/49

block0 original weighted integral := sum(-330/49, -10/49)

block0 original weighted integral = -340/49

block0 positive-mass conditional mean := div(-340/49, 5/7)

block0 positive-mass conditional mean = -68/7

block label=0;indices=[0, 1];positive mass=5/7;weighted integral=-340/49

block-constant conditional value=-68/7

block1 mass := sum(12/49, 2/49)

block1 mass = 2/7

block1 atom2 weighted X := mul(12/49, 3)

block1 atom2 weighted X = 36/49

block1 atom3 weighted X := mul(2/49, 11)

block1 atom3 weighted X = 22/49

block1 original weighted integral := sum(36/49, 22/49)

block1 original weighted integral = 58/49

block1 positive-mass conditional mean := div(58/49, 2/7)

block1 positive-mass conditional mean = 29/7

block label=1;indices=[2, 3];positive mass=2/7;weighted integral=58/49

block-constant conditional value=29/7

block=0;indices=[0, 1];conditional values=[-68/7, -68/7]

distinct values in encounter order=[-68/7];constant=Yes

block=1;indices=[2, 3];conditional values=[29/7, 29/7]

distinct values in encounter order=[29/7];constant=Yes

Reverse checks

• S017 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
• S016 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
• S015 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
• S014 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute block1 positive-mass conditional mean with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
• S013 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute block1 original weighted integral with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
• S012 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute block1 atom3 weighted X with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
• S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute block1 atom2 weighted X with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
• S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute block1 mass with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
• S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
• S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute block0 positive-mass conditional mean with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
• S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute block0 original weighted integral with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
• S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute block0 atom1 weighted X with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
• S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute block0 atom0 weighted X with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
• S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute block0 mass with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
• S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
• S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
• S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute conditional model whole mass sum with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.

Result

([-68/7, -68/7, 29/7, 29/7], [[0, [0, 1], [-68/7], Yes], [1, [2, 3], [29/7], Yes]], Yes)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.