Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 14485: Identical Distribution Means the Complete Marginal, Not Just Its Mean

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 73

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0027-14485 · q-20261014-advance-20261029-r06-iid-sequence-0035

Original question and givens

Use the explicitly declared Bernoulli product-law model with exact p=10/29 in [0,1]. Infinite IID requires the complete identical Bernoulli marginal and mutual independence for every finite subfamily, represented here by the symbolic product-law cylinder certificate. Equal means, pairwise independence or checking one finite prefix is insufficient. Use exact reduced fractions with positive denominators, omitting /1 for integers. No law of large numbers, central limit theorem or additional Markov conclusion is asserted. left_index=9, right_index=26. Give (left_index,right_index,[0,zero_mass],[1,one_mass],identical?,full_Bernoulli_marginal_not_mean_only).

  • G001 — Use the explicitly declared Bernoulli product-law model with exact p=10/29 in [0,1]. Infinite IID requires the complete identical Bernoulli marginal and mutual independence for every finite subfamily, represented here by the symbolic product-law cylinder certificate. Equal means, pairwise independence or checking one finite prefix is insufficient. Use exact reduced fractions with positive denominators, omitting /1 for integers. No law of large numbers, central limit theorem or additional Markov conclusion is asserted. left_index=9, right_index=26. Give (left_index,right_index,[0,zero_mass],[1,one_mass],identical?,full_Bernoulli_marginal_not_mean_only).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · calculation

Before

Bernoulli zero-outcome mass := sub(1, 10/29)

After

Bernoulli zero-outcome mass = 19/29

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles,complete pairings and established intermediates,retaining denominators,signs and zeros.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

raw Bernoulli parameter=[10, 29]

After

normalized p=10/29;mass at0=19/29;mass at1=10/29;symbolic product-law model explicitly declared

Conditions: none

Retain the complete{0,1} marginal and the explicitly declared product-law premise.Infinite IID is not inferred from a data set,equal means or pairwise checks.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Bernoulli_complete_marginal_and_product_law_premise · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

indices=[9, 26];same declared Bernoulli product law

After

both complete marginals:mass0=19/29;mass1=10/29;identical=Yes

Conditions: none

List both outcome masses at each index,including zero masses for degenerate parameters.Equal means alone do not establish identical distribution for general variables,let alone independence.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: IID_full_identical_marginal_not_general_mean_test · Uses: G001, S002

Reverse checks

  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Bernoulli zero-outcome mass with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.

Result

(9, 26, [0, 19/29], [1, 10/29], Yes, full_Bernoulli_marginal_not_mean_only)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 8820329715dedd51c2ece7d932de9a30781667e279afbfc85fb475d2dce7ff4c
  • candidate record SHA-256: 1db6983f43f6a862253223917b563eee664a65fbba4ce426464ed227800e10fe
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: e49bf5eaa968c09ebac4ad538ce58251671ed922c957cee1471cfc7b68934bfe
  • question-first witness SHA-256: a7976057c26051fab92342fc95d48af224466c0e1e4ab6ae4c8811c02772e6da
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON