Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 14467: Multiply Every Ordered Atom Factor in the Finite Word

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 73

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0027-14467 · q-20261014-advance-20261029-r06-iid-sequence-0067

Original question and givens

Use the explicitly declared Bernoulli product-law model with exact p=17/29 in [0,1]. Infinite IID requires the complete identical Bernoulli marginal and mutual independence for every finite subfamily, represented here by the symbolic product-law cylinder certificate. Equal means, pairwise independence or checking one finite prefix is insufficient. Use exact reduced fractions with positive denominators, omitting /1 for integers. No law of large numbers, central limit theorem or additional Markov conclusion is asserted. Ordered binary word=[0, 0, 0, 0]. Give (word,atom_factors,product,pass?).

  • G001 — Use the explicitly declared Bernoulli product-law model with exact p=17/29 in [0,1]. Infinite IID requires the complete identical Bernoulli marginal and mutual independence for every finite subfamily, represented here by the symbolic product-law cylinder certificate. Equal means, pairwise independence or checking one finite prefix is insufficient. Use exact reduced fractions with positive denominators, omitting /1 for integers. No law of large numbers, central limit theorem or additional Markov conclusion is asserted. Ordered binary word=[0, 0, 0, 0]. Give (word,atom_factors,product,pass?).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · calculation

Before

Bernoulli zero-outcome mass := sub(1, 17/29)

After

Bernoulli zero-outcome mass = 12/29

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles,complete pairings and established intermediates,retaining denominators,signs and zeros.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

raw Bernoulli parameter=[17, 29]

After

normalized p=17/29;mass at0=12/29;mass at1=17/29;symbolic product-law model explicitly declared

Conditions: none

Retain the complete{0,1} marginal and the explicitly declared product-law premise.Infinite IID is not inferred from a data set,equal means or pairwise checks.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Bernoulli_complete_marginal_and_product_law_premise · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

original ordered finite binary word=[0, 0, 0, 0];p=17/29;one-minus-p=12/29

After

cylinder atom factorization uses the same declared symbolic product law

Conditions: none

Preserve word order,use p for1 and1−p for0.Factorization is a model premise,not a test proving independence of an unknown dependent law.Retain empty words and p=0 or1 boundaries.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: IID_ordered_word_and_given_model_not_unknown_law_test · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

word position=0;original bit=0

After

aligned atom factor=12/29

Conditions: none

Choose the correct marginal factor at every original position,retaining zero factors without any conditional-probability division.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: IID_each_original_bit_factor · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

ordered factor prefix product0 := mul(1, 12/29)

After

ordered factor prefix product0 = 12/29

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles,complete pairings and established intermediates,retaining denominators,signs and zeros.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

word position=1;original bit=0

After

aligned atom factor=12/29

Conditions: none

Choose the correct marginal factor at every original position,retaining zero factors without any conditional-probability division.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: IID_each_original_bit_factor · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · calculation

Before

ordered factor prefix product1 := mul(12/29, 12/29)

After

ordered factor prefix product1 = 144/841

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles,complete pairings and established intermediates,retaining denominators,signs and zeros.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · implies

Before

word position=2;original bit=0

After

aligned atom factor=12/29

Conditions: none

Choose the correct marginal factor at every original position,retaining zero factors without any conditional-probability division.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: IID_each_original_bit_factor · Uses: G001, S007

S009 · calculation

Before

ordered factor prefix product2 := mul(144/841, 12/29)

After

ordered factor prefix product2 = 1728/24389

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles,complete pairings and established intermediates,retaining denominators,signs and zeros.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S008

S010 · implies

Before

word position=3;original bit=0

After

aligned atom factor=12/29

Conditions: none

Choose the correct marginal factor at every original position,retaining zero factors without any conditional-probability division.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: IID_each_original_bit_factor · Uses: G001, S009

S011 · calculation

Before

ordered factor prefix product3 := mul(1728/24389, 12/29)

After

ordered factor prefix product3 = 20736/707281

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles,complete pairings and established intermediates,retaining denominators,signs and zeros.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S010

S012 · implies

Before

ordered atom factors=[12/29, 12/29, 12/29, 12/29]

After

finite product=20736/707281;model factorization check=Yes

Conditions: none

Multiply every factor in original order,starting an empty list at identity1.Pass checks this finite calculation within the declared product model;it does not extrapolate arbitrary infinite IID from finite samples.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: IID_finite_factorization_scope_not_new_infinite_proof · Uses: G001, S011

Reverse checks

  • S012 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ordered factor prefix product3 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ordered factor prefix product2 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ordered factor prefix product1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ordered factor prefix product0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Bernoulli zero-outcome mass with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.

Result

([0, 0, 0, 0], [12/29, 12/29, 12/29, 12/29], 20736/707281, Yes)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: c2b066438fb15cee8c0908f9743a5313db35a47990c90b096ddb7b233c5ddefb
  • candidate record SHA-256: c0eba7fd2a92ec69ffd8d46e294dc7984408bf8575725d6f1018fd176d7006a7
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: e49bf5eaa968c09ebac4ad538ce58251671ed922c957cee1471cfc7b68934bfe
  • question-first witness SHA-256: a7976057c26051fab92342fc95d48af224466c0e1e4ab6ae4c8811c02772e6da
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON