Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 14432: A Longer Fixed Prefix Still Does Not Certify an Infinite IID Sequence

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 73

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0027-14432 · q-20261014-advance-20261029-r06-iid-sequence-0082

Original question and givens

Use the explicitly declared Bernoulli product-law model with exact p=7/29 in [0,1]. Infinite IID requires the complete identical Bernoulli marginal and mutual independence for every finite subfamily, represented here by the symbolic product-law cylinder certificate. Equal means, pairwise independence or checking one finite prefix is insufficient. Use exact reduced fractions with positive denominators, omitting /1 for integers. No law of large numbers, central limit theorem or additional Markov conclusion is asserted. evidence_mode=symbolic_product_law, checked_prefix=7. Give (p,evidence_mode,checked_prefix,sufficient?,boundary). symbolic_product_law yields infinite_IID_certificate; finite_prefix_only yields finite_prefix_only_not_infinite_IID.

  • G001 — Use the explicitly declared Bernoulli product-law model with exact p=7/29 in [0,1]. Infinite IID requires the complete identical Bernoulli marginal and mutual independence for every finite subfamily, represented here by the symbolic product-law cylinder certificate. Equal means, pairwise independence or checking one finite prefix is insufficient. Use exact reduced fractions with positive denominators, omitting /1 for integers. No law of large numbers, central limit theorem or additional Markov conclusion is asserted. evidence_mode=symbolic_product_law, checked_prefix=7. Give (p,evidence_mode,checked_prefix,sufficient?,boundary). symbolic_product_law yields infinite_IID_certificate; finite_prefix_only yields finite_prefix_only_not_infinite_IID.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · calculation

Before

Bernoulli zero-outcome mass := sub(1, 7/29)

After

Bernoulli zero-outcome mass = 22/29

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles,complete pairings and established intermediates,retaining denominators,signs and zeros.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

raw Bernoulli parameter=[7, 29]

After

normalized p=7/29;mass at0=22/29;mass at1=7/29;symbolic product-law model explicitly declared

Conditions: none

Retain the complete{0,1} marginal and the explicitly declared product-law premise.Infinite IID is not inferred from a data set,equal means or pairwise checks.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Bernoulli_complete_marginal_and_product_law_premise · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

p=7/29;selected evidence=symbolic_product_law;checked finite prefix length=7

After

sufficient infinite-IID evidence=Yes

Conditions: none

The declared product model assigns the identical-marginal product to every finite-index cylinder,providing this symbolic certificate.A fixed prefix,however long,does not control all future subfamilies.No rejects evidence sufficiency,not existence of the Bernoulli product model,and supplies no LLN/CLT.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: IID_infinite_cylinders_not_fixed_prefix · Uses: G001, S002

Reverse checks

  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Bernoulli zero-outcome mass with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.

Result

(7/29, symbolic_product_law, 7, Yes, infinite_IID_certificate)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 18368c162eaa32809faf0483353a279aa920cae652277a2d2a0f34b17af7ddee
  • candidate record SHA-256: 6534a4debf950e608a20a7b8885b9ac43191a3bee7a9830618c1386c461a6b54
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: e49bf5eaa968c09ebac4ad538ce58251671ed922c957cee1471cfc7b68934bfe
  • question-first witness SHA-256: a7976057c26051fab92342fc95d48af224466c0e1e4ab6ae4c8811c02772e6da
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON