Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 15271: Bind Finite-Dimensional Completeness to the Same Inner-Product Space

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 77

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0029-15271 · q-20261014-advance-20261030-r02-real-hilbert-space-0021

Original question and givens

Use the same real plane with symmetric positive-definite matrix G=[[22, 2], [2, 5]] and inner product <x,y>=x^T G y. Its induced norm and metric belong to that same carrier, not to unrelated structures. Declared dimension=2; it must equal the matrix carrier dimension. Give (dimension,matrix,same_inner_product_norm_metric_carrier,finite_dimensional_complete,qualified?,no_compactness_or_separability_claim).

  • G001 — Use the same real plane with symmetric positive-definite matrix G=[[22, 2], [2, 5]] and inner product <x,y>=x^T G y. Its induced norm and metric belong to that same carrier, not to unrelated structures. Declared dimension=2; it must equal the matrix carrier dimension. Give (dimension,matrix,same_inner_product_norm_metric_carrier,finite_dimensional_complete,qualified?,no_compactness_or_separability_claim).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · calculation

Before

Hilbert Gram diagonal product := mul(22, 5)

After

Hilbert Gram diagonal product = 110

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining denominators,strict guards,indices and signs.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001

S002 · calculation

Before

Hilbert Gram off-diagonal product := mul(2, 2)

After

Hilbert Gram off-diagonal product = 4

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining denominators,strict guards,indices and signs.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

Hilbert Gram determinant := sub(110, 4)

After

Hilbert Gram determinant = 106

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining denominators,strict guards,indices and signs.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

Hilbert completing-square slope := div(2, 22)

After

Hilbert completing-square slope = 1/11

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining denominators,strict guards,indices and signs.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

Hilbert completing-square positive residual := div(106, 22)

After

Hilbert completing-square positive residual = 53/11

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining denominators,strict guards,indices and signs.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

complete real carrier R^2;Gram matrix=[[22, 2], [2, 5]];a=22>0;det=106>0;dimension declaration=2

After

x^T M x=22*(x0+(1/11)*x1)^2+(53/11)*x1^2;zero only at x=0

Conditions: none

Symmetry and positive principal minors give positivity for every real vector by completing the square,not just testing the displayed vectors.The triangular transformation is invertible,so this inner-product norm is equivalent to the coordinate norm on R².A Cauchy sequence has convergent coordinates and its limit remains in this same R².

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: hilbert_same_complete_matrix_positive_inner_product · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · implies

Before

same R^2 carrier and complete Gram matrix=[[22, 2], [2, 5]];induced norm=sqrt(x^T M x);distance=norm(x-y)

After

same_inner_product_norm_metric_carrier;finite_dimensional_complete;no_compactness_or_separability_claim

Conditions: none

Use this very inner product for the norm and this very norm for the metric.The finite-dimensional completeness statement applies to that same carrier and norm,which supplies Hilbert qualification.This answer adds no compactness or separability claim and neither property replaces completeness.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: hilbert_named_certificate_same_norm_metric_completeness · Uses: G001, S006

Reverse checks

  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Hilbert completing-square positive residual with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Hilbert completing-square slope with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Hilbert Gram determinant with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Hilbert Gram off-diagonal product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Hilbert Gram diagonal product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.

Result

(2, [[22, 2], [2, 5]], same_inner_product_norm_metric_carrier, finite_dimensional_complete, Yes, no_compactness_or_separability_claim)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 1f97a2b800fac66c9e99f00bb1dc1fe2795808d7bb51f8852fb3abab4fc85adf
  • candidate record SHA-256: 953d4e22b6fa4e44156574eb8816ebd4c1e853998ac4a1da9c35c7530f391d61
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 8c0ef6ca8c5ba2754e41f30c2b32bcb757756152d97421f7396d39038c11f725
  • question-first witness SHA-256: c7920a0ff8e724b7e566ebbda30b31d8087c136974b62f8c760fbd26ab816117
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON