Question 15426: Verify Coverage and Disjointness of the Full Class Collection

Original question and givens

Use the same complete carrier Fin(6)={0,…,5} and certified equivalence relation pairs=[[0, 0], [0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [0, 4], [0, 5], [1, 0], [1, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [1, 5], [2, 0], [2, 1], [2, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [2, 5], [3, 0], [3, 1], [3, 2], [3, 3], [3, 4], [3, 5], [4, 0], [4, 1], [4, 2], [4, 3], [4, 4], [4, 5], [5, 0], [5, 1], [5, 2], [5, 3], [5, 4], [5, 5]]. Reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity are prior complete obligations. The quotient contains all distinct full equivalence classes, not selected representatives. Sort elements within a class increasingly and enumerate classes by their least unseen carrier label. Quotient operations require a separate representative-independence proof. Give (classes,covers?,disjoint?).

• G001 — Use the same complete carrier Fin(6)={0,…,5} and certified equivalence relation pairs=[[0, 0], [0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [0, 4], [0, 5], [1, 0], [1, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [1, 5], [2, 0], [2, 1], [2, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [2, 5], [3, 0], [3, 1], [3, 2], [3, 3], [3, 4], [3, 5], [4, 0], [4, 1], [4, 2], [4, 3], [4, 4], [4, 5], [5, 0], [5, 1], [5, 2], [5, 3], [5, 4], [5, 5]]. Reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity are prior complete obligations. The quotient contains all distinct full equivalence classes, not selected representatives. Sort elements within a class increasingly and enumerate classes by their least unseen carrier label. Quotient operations require a separate representative-independence proof. Give (classes,covers?,disjoint?).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

• mko-quotient-set

Step-by-step derivation

complete carrier Fin(6);original relation pairs=[[0, 0], [0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [0, 4], [0, 5], [1, 0], [1, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [1, 5], [2, 0], [2, 1], [2, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [2, 5], [3, 0], [3, 1], [3, 2], [3, 3], [3, 4], [3, 5], [4, 0], [4, 1], [4, 2], [4, 3], [4, 4], [4, 5], [5, 0], [5, 1], [5, 2], [5, 3], [5, 4], [5, 5]]

set of pairs=[[0, 0], [0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [0, 4], [0, 5], [1, 0], [1, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [1, 5], [2, 0], [2, 1], [2, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [2, 5], [3, 0], [3, 1], [3, 2], [3, 3], [3, 4], [3, 5], [4, 0], [4, 1], [4, 2], [4, 3], [4, 4], [4, 5], [5, 0], [5, 1], [5, 2], [5, 3], [5, 4], [5, 5]];reflexive/symmetric/transitive=[Yes, Yes, Yes]

least uncovered carrier label=0;all labels related from it=[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

next canonical full class=[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5];covered labels=[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

all complete canonical classes=[[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]];original carrier=[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

cover whole carrier=Yes;pairwise disjoint=Yes;class count=1

Reverse checks

• S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
• S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
• S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]], Yes, Yes)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.