Use the complete finite source=[180, 181, 182, 183] and target=[280, 281, 282, 283, 284] as distinct-element lists in their original orders. A mapping must be total on that exact source and every image must belong to that exact target. Injectivity and surjectivity are independent mapping properties, not guesses from equal list lengths. The comparison certificates here are finite-only; no unrestricted infinite-set or choice conclusion is inferred. No mapping is supplied in this family. Give (source_size,target_size,larger?,conclusion). conclusion is no_injection_finite_pigeonhole or no_impossibility_certificate.
G001 — Use the complete finite source=[180, 181, 182, 183] and target=[280, 281, 282, 283, 284] as distinct-element lists in their original orders. A mapping must be total on that exact source and every image must belong to that exact target. Injectivity and surjectivity are independent mapping properties, not guesses from equal list lengths. The comparison certificates here are finite-only; no unrestricted infinite-set or choice conclusion is inferred. No mapping is supplied in this family. Give (source_size,target_size,larger?,conclusion). conclusion is no_injection_finite_pigeonhole or no_impossibility_certificate.
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
This family compares set cardinalities,so repetitions do not add elements.No particular mapping is supplied,and no specific collision pair is invented.
An injection has as many distinct images as source elements,all within the target,hence ns≤nt.A larger source contradicts this and excludes every injection.No means this size-based impossibility certificate does not apply,not that an unspecified map failed.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
Result
(4, 5, No, no_impossibility_certificate)
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.