Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 15017: Evaluate the Deviation Profile Only at a Valid Probability Index

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 76

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0029-15017 · q-20261014-advance-20261030-r07-convergence-in-probability-0017

Original question and givens

Use the declared rational deviation-probability tail p_n=2/(n+4) on nonnegative integer indices where this value belongs to[0,1], starting no earlier than max(0,numerator-shift). The common probability space and infinite-process interpretation remain declared premises, not constructions inferred from finitely many numbers. Keep exact reduced rational outputs with positive denominators, omitting /1 for integers. Evaluate index n=17. Give (numerator,shift,n,deviation_probability).

  • G001 — Use the declared rational deviation-probability tail p_n=2/(n+4) on nonnegative integer indices where this value belongs to[0,1], starting no earlier than max(0,numerator-shift). The common probability space and infinite-process interpretation remain declared premises, not constructions inferred from finitely many numbers. Keep exact reduced rational outputs with positive denominators, omitting /1 for integers. Evaluate index n=17. Give (numerator,shift,n,deviation_probability).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

positive profile parameters c=2;s=4;raw fraction=c/(n+s)

After

nonnegative valid probability indices start at=0;only there0<profile<=1

Conditions: none

A positive denominator and value≤1 require n+s≥c.Keep the original index;do not clip values above1 or silently shift them.This checks arithmetic domain only.The infinite-process/common-space interpretation remains declared,and the prefix-only family gains no infinite continuation premise.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: deviation_profile_probability_domain_not_clipping · Uses: G001

S002 · calculation

Before

deviation denominator at original index := sum(17, 4)

After

deviation denominator at original index = 21

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining denominators,strict guards,indices and signs.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

deviation probability at original index := div(2, 21)

After

deviation probability at original index = 2/21

Conditions: none

Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining denominators,strict guards,indices and signs.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

Reverse checks

  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute deviation probability at original index with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute deviation denominator at original index with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(2, 4, 17, 2/21)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: b5d6543c6a682baf172ca4a276d39e607d8504b0da73db5256aa6b6a05363381
  • candidate record SHA-256: 9c2352967f2099c9704059bc05b49f040d0a88768f0aa3a9ea9d1232b2eced85
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 8c0ef6ca8c5ba2754e41f30c2b32bcb757756152d97421f7396d39038c11f725
  • question-first witness SHA-256: c7920a0ff8e724b7e566ebbda30b31d8087c136974b62f8c760fbd26ab816117
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON